2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydration process and microstructure evolution of low exothermic concrete produced with urea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the curing treatment, the porosities of U0.20F3.0, U0.18F3.0, and U0.16F3.0 were 3.07%, 2.53%, and 1.92%, respectively, which followed the sequence U0.20F3.0 > U0.18F3.0 > U0.16F3.0, as shown in Figure 3a. The porosity of UHPC was lower than that of high-strength concrete [45], and this was similar to the findings of Yu et al [27], Wang et al [46], and Jiang et al [47]. The porosities of U0.18F3.0 and U0.16F3.0 were invariably lower than that of U0.20F3.0, which suggested that the porosity of UHPC diminished when the water/binder ratio of UHPC was reduced.…”
Section: Microstructuresupporting
confidence: 87%
“…After the curing treatment, the porosities of U0.20F3.0, U0.18F3.0, and U0.16F3.0 were 3.07%, 2.53%, and 1.92%, respectively, which followed the sequence U0.20F3.0 > U0.18F3.0 > U0.16F3.0, as shown in Figure 3a. The porosity of UHPC was lower than that of high-strength concrete [45], and this was similar to the findings of Yu et al [27], Wang et al [46], and Jiang et al [47]. The porosities of U0.18F3.0 and U0.16F3.0 were invariably lower than that of U0.20F3.0, which suggested that the porosity of UHPC diminished when the water/binder ratio of UHPC was reduced.…”
Section: Microstructuresupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These values indicate that an increasing GO content leads to a nonlinear reduction in the porosity of RS-UHPC. The porosity of the RS-UHPC prepared in this study was lower than those of low-heat concrete [ 46 ], sacrificial concrete [ 47 , 48 ], and UHPC mixed with coarse aggregates [ 49 ]. The lowest porosity of RS-UHPC was observed when the GO concentration was 0.05 wt.% Therefore, from the perspective of the porosity, the optimum GO concentration to be mixed in RS-UHPC is 0.05 wt.%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be seen from Figure 12 that the temperatures recorded at the same depth are different on different dates. This is because a great deal of heat is produced by the concrete during the hydration process which causes the temperature to change over time [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. This will affect the temperature increment produced by the heating belt in the joint area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%