2007
DOI: 10.1021/ja0685957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydration Dynamics and Time Scales of Coupled Water−Protein Fluctuations

Abstract: We report experimental and theoretical studies on water and protein dynamics following photoexcitation of apomyoglobin. Using site-directed mutation and with femtosecond resolution, we experimentally observed relaxation dynamics with a biphasic distribution of time scales, 5 and 87 ps, around the site Trp7. Theoretical studies using both linear response and direct nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (MD) calculations reproduced the biphasic behavior. Further constrained MD simulations with either frozen protein … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
335
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(372 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
32
335
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this single intrinsic tryptophan as a local optical probe and from the measurements of three mutants with a charged, polar, or hydrophobic residue around the probe, we unambiguously determined the time scales of hydration dynamics at the active site to be 0.47-0.67 and 10.8-13.2 ps. The former time is the result of local reorientational/translational motions of water near the active site; the latter is a direct measure of surface hydration coupled with the local protein fluctuation (45). These results are consistent with our recent studies of surface hydration dynamics in enzyme Staphylococcus nuclease (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using this single intrinsic tryptophan as a local optical probe and from the measurements of three mutants with a charged, polar, or hydrophobic residue around the probe, we unambiguously determined the time scales of hydration dynamics at the active site to be 0.47-0.67 and 10.8-13.2 ps. The former time is the result of local reorientational/translational motions of water near the active site; the latter is a direct measure of surface hydration coupled with the local protein fluctuation (45). These results are consistent with our recent studies of surface hydration dynamics in enzyme Staphylococcus nuclease (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Under this perturbation, the response can result from both the surrounding water molecules and the protein (polar/charged residues and backbone) (45). Within 7 Å from W31, there is only one charged residue, D60, at 3.59 Å, which forms a hydrogen bond between O of the carboxyl group and N of the indole ring (Fig.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solvation becomes faster. This was also observed by Singer et al 12,50 The slowest component above ~100ps disappears when the amino acid side chains are not fluctuating. This indicates the role of amino acid side chain fluctuations in a substantial retardation of solvation timescales.…”
Section: B Solvation Dynamics Of Tryptophan: Effect Of Adjacent Charsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…50 Zhong et al showed that charged/polar residues as well as the side-chain fluctuations play a major role in slowness. 15,44,50 It is straightforward to understand the reason of fastness on freezing side chain motion because a slow component is removed from time dependence of solvation energy. However, the role of water molecules inside the PHL in slowing down the dynamics and their relative contribution is not properly addressed.…”
Section: (I) What Are the Prevailing Factors Responsible For The Slowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the comparable time scale, stabilization energy, and solvation speed indicate that both sites have the similar polar environment and initial ultrafast response. The second relaxation in tens of picoseconds reflects the coupled water-protein motions, a collective rearrangement of the local configuration (19,20,39). Although both sites have a similar time scale of approximately 20 ps, the At(6-4)-Wt has a stabilization energy of 471 cm −1 , about ten times larger than that of EcPhr-Wt, leading to a significantly larger solvation speed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%