1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00751338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydra ? A 3-dimensional electron and ion hot plasma instrument for the POLAR spacecraft of the GGS mission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
149
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are nevertheless reasonably confident that our calibration is on the whole accurate to within $30% with O + , H + , and He + data included here (obtained before 9 December 1998), provided their signal-to-background ratio is substantially greater than one. It may actually be somewhat better, considering the rather good agreement we have found in flight with positive-ion spectra from the Polar HYDRA instrument (electron and ion hot plasma instrument) [Scudder et al, 1995] when H + ions dominate. We cannot make the same claim with respect to He ++ data, however, at least not in the cusp regions, where intense H + count rates interfere with the H + versus He ++ anode positioning in ways that were not anticipated and therefore not calibrated prior to flight.…”
Section: Margins Of Errormentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We are nevertheless reasonably confident that our calibration is on the whole accurate to within $30% with O + , H + , and He + data included here (obtained before 9 December 1998), provided their signal-to-background ratio is substantially greater than one. It may actually be somewhat better, considering the rather good agreement we have found in flight with positive-ion spectra from the Polar HYDRA instrument (electron and ion hot plasma instrument) [Scudder et al, 1995] when H + ions dominate. We cannot make the same claim with respect to He ++ data, however, at least not in the cusp regions, where intense H + count rates interfere with the H + versus He ++ anode positioning in ways that were not anticipated and therefore not calibrated prior to flight.…”
Section: Margins Of Errormentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Again, it consists of multiple bursts of plasma, both ions and electrons (electron data have been obtained from the HYDRA instrument [Scudder et al, 1995] but are not shown here), with flux levels comparable to those of the central plasma sheet, especially the heated flux found during disturbed conditions. It may be noted that the individual bursts, while …”
Section: Ion Observationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Hydra instrument measures the three-dimensional electron and ion velocity-space distribution functions using 12 narrow field-of-view detectors spread over the unit sphere [Scudder et al, 1995]. The distribution functions described here cover the energy range from 5 eV/q to 20 keV/q with a temporal resolution of 13.8 s. Throughout the entire time period from about 0255 to 0708 UT, the Hydra instrument detected dense magnetosheath-like plasma.…”
Section: Overview Of Regions Encountered On May 29 1996mentioning
confidence: 99%