Ethnography After Humanism 2017
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-53933-5_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrids of Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This involves taking part in social life as it occurs, so as to form longstanding relationships with participants, giving the basis for an understanding of the depth and complexity of human society and culture. Ethnographers are increasingly completing observations of human relationships with non-human animals, within ‘multispecies ethnography’ methods [ 26 , 27 ]. Despite this, ethnographic methods are not frequently employed in the study of animal welfare, though Adelman and Thompson identify this as a key area for the future development of equestrian social science [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involves taking part in social life as it occurs, so as to form longstanding relationships with participants, giving the basis for an understanding of the depth and complexity of human society and culture. Ethnographers are increasingly completing observations of human relationships with non-human animals, within ‘multispecies ethnography’ methods [ 26 , 27 ]. Despite this, ethnographic methods are not frequently employed in the study of animal welfare, though Adelman and Thompson identify this as a key area for the future development of equestrian social science [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We human subjects are those who decide what and how to collect data and how to present it, and this inevitably involves representation; a representation that is more difficult when those we represent are not human and often share a tiny amount or nothing of our language (Sanders and Arluke, 1993). We observe, record, speak and write and it is unsurprising, therefore, that most usually what we find begs ‘the obvious question, where are the animals themselves in this research?’ (Hamilton and Taylor, 2017: 2). There are also ethical questions raised – even if we manage to represent animals in our research, what do those represented (either individually or collectively) actually gain from our enquiries and academic outputs?…”
Section: Animalising Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Rather, it considers some of the ways in which conducting research with and about dogs alters both the data you obtain and the ways in which you understand the data collection process. The article moves through, first, a discussion of the ‘animal turn’ in sociology and sociological resistance to it (Cudworth, 2011a; Peggs, 2012; Shapiro, 2002; Whatmore, 2006; Wilkie, 2015); and, second, the animal turn in methodology (Charles, 2016; Taylor, 2012), in particular, in ethnography (Hamilton and Taylor, 2017) before discussing the methods used in this project and some of the practices and events that emerged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade or so there has been greater inclusion of other animals in sociological research and some – within and without the discipline – have argued there is a need to take ‘nonhuman animals seriously, treating them as aware actors on the social stage’ (Birke, 2011: xx; see also, for example, Cudworth, 2016; Coulter, 2016; Gillespie, 2018; Hamilton and Taylor, 2017; Nibert, 2003; Peggs, 2013; Philo and Wilbert, 2000; Emel and Wolch, 1998). In this article we extend this focus by considering how animal companions themselves are at risk of violence when living in households with TNB people where abuse is present.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%