Hybrids and Regulation in the Global Political Economy

Abstract

While regulation theory literature has made important contributions to the much-debated domain of globalisation by focusing on various aspects of post-Fordism, it has not yet fully engaged with the implications that can be drawn from critical approaches in international political economy. Recent studies have explored the transnational bases of new patterns and agents of change beyond states, firms and institutions traditionally involved in regulatory practices. Hybrid is often used as a default attribute reflecting lack of clear understanding of the breadth of this new type of influence and the opacity of the means involved. Drawing on the insights of philology and mythology, the paper argues that the notion of hybrid is relevant in elucidating the ontological ambiguity between imaginary and real aspects of globalisation. Furthermore, it specifies the categories involved in the analysis of emerging forms of hybrid regulation. Recent scholarship on globalisation tends to focus on the private-public nexus of the subjects involved in new forms of institutional arrangements and authority. Here, subjects, objects and space are analysed as joint issues. By focusing particularly on transformations affecting the role of the state, forms of competition, and their rescaling on a transnational basis, the concept of global hybrid is seen as complementary to the emancipation of regulation approaches from early emphasis on national levels of compromises.

Steering the governance of artificial intelligence: national strategies in perspective

“…The ambiguity and uncertainty related to the future of AI may structure interactions as a way to preserve freedom of action. From this perspective, the process of function indetermination reflects a decision to allow for open-ended possibilities: 'tasks so far assigned to the polity can be transposed with increasing ease to a web of "authorities" created for the purpose of making decisions on technical and scientific issues' (Graz, 2006). Whether such changes are entailed in the national strategies is a key part of the analysis.…”

‘Incantatory’ Governance: Global Climate Politics’ Performative Turn and its Wider Significance for Global Politics

“…The global diffusion of 'regulatory capitalism' (Lévi-Faur, 2005) and the rise of 'private authority' (Hall and Biersteker, 2002;Pattberg, 2005) challenge the long-standing supremacy of states and international organisations in global affairs. In a multi-actor world (Kaul et al, 1999), global governance no longer unfolds through state-led multilateralism alone, but also through forms of 'transnational regulation' (Djelic and Sahlin-Andersson, 2006), 'hybrid governance arrangements' (Graz, 2006;Andonova, 2010) and networks of corporate self-regulation (Müller and Cloiseau, 2015;Short, 2012).…”

‘Incantatory’ governance: global climate politics’ performative turn and its wider significance for global politics

“…The global diffusion of 'regulatory capitalism' (Lévi-Faur 2005) and the rise of 'private authority' (Hall and Biersteker 2002;Pattberg 2005) challenge the long-standing supremacy of states and international organisations in global affairs. In a multi-actor world (Kaul et al 1999), global governance no longer unfolds through state-led multilateralism alone, but also through forms of 'transnational regulation', 'hybrid governance arrangements' (Graz 2006;Andonova 2010) and networks of corporate self-regulation (Müller and Cloiseau 2015; Short 2012).…”