2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2015.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybridizing genetic algorithm with differential evolution for solving the unit commitment scheduling problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (24) means that the features of solution are changed by solution H i and solution H e . At first, the new solution is more affected by another better solution which accelerates the convergence characteristics of the algorithm.…”
Section: Migration Operator For Ssd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation (24) means that the features of solution are changed by solution H i and solution H e . At first, the new solution is more affected by another better solution which accelerates the convergence characteristics of the algorithm.…”
Section: Migration Operator For Ssd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybridization between the BBO and Differential Evolution Algorithm (DE) has achieved many great results [24][25][26]. However, they mostly incorporate DE into the migration procedure.…”
Section: Mutation Operator For Ssd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Ther conversion of energy into electricity, several methods of optimization to resolve the problem of unit commitment (UC) have been used in the literature, including a technique of primacies list, classical mathematical programming techniques, like Lagrangian Relaxation (LR) and dynamic programming (DP) and more newly artificial intelligence (AI) techniques [12]. Although, requiring small computation time and easy to implement, the priority list technique does not guarantee an opportune resolution near the global optimal one, which implies an operation of higher cost [13,14].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal energy conversion into electric energy has a significant state of art on optimization methods for solving the thermal scheduling problem (ScP), ranging from the old priorities list method to the traditional mathematical methods up to the more lately reported artificial intelligence methods [10]. The priority list method is easily implemented and requires a small processing time, but does not guarantee an appropriate solution near the global optimal one [11].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%