2019
DOI: 10.1137/18m1223836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybridized CutFEM for Elliptic Interface Problems

Abstract: We design and analyze a hybridized cut finite element method for elliptic interface problems. In this method very general meshes can be coupled over internal unfitted interfaces, through a skeletal variable, using a Nitsche type approach. We discuss how optimal error estimates for the method are obtained using the tools of cut finite element methods and prove a condition number estimate for the Schur complement. Finally, we present illustrating numerical examples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we establish the convergence of the iterative procedure ( 8)- (12). This Theorem is one of the novel contributions of this paper.…”
Section: Convergence Theoremmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section we establish the convergence of the iterative procedure ( 8)- (12). This Theorem is one of the novel contributions of this paper.…”
Section: Convergence Theoremmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The use of classical methods involves remeshing at each time step, which requires difficult-to-implement and expensive refinement-and-derefinement algorithms [47,13,35,38,4]. Expensive meshing/remeshing can be avoided by resorting to unfitted methods, such as GFEM/XFEM [32,6] (and, more generally, partition of unit methods, ( [43]), Immersed Finite Element [49,41], CutFEM ( [12]), or hierarchical methods such as the finite cell method with local enrichment [31] or hp-d methods [21,45,52,55,61]. Alternatively, one can resort to methods that facilitate the remeshing procedure by allowing polygonal elements, with possibly curved edges/faces, such as the virtual element method [20,5,10,14,1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now suppose that u g is defined on Ω Γ h , cf. (8), rather than on the whole of Ω h . We keep the primal unknown u in (9) and we want to impose…”
Section: Dirichlet Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The simplest meaningful example in the realm of linear elasticity is given by structures consisting of multiple materials having different elasticity parameters. This situation has already been treated in XFEM [12,2,31,30], CutFEM [8,20,19,24], and SBM [25] paradigms. We are now going to demonstrate the applicability of φ-FEM in this context.…”
Section: Test Casementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, we may consider bifurcating cracks where a so called Kirchhoff condition holds along the intersection, cracks that meet the boundary, and cracks which are piecewise smooth. We refer to [5,8,11,24], for details on how to construct CutFEM for bifurcating cracks and how to handle the Kirchhoff condition weakly in a systematic manner. The regularity of the exact solution may be locally lower due to nonconvex corners and edges and therefore there may be a need for adaptive mesh refinement.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%