2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-006-0090-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybridization of mafic microgranular enclaves: mineral and whole-rock chemistry evidence from the Karamadazı Granitoid, Central Turkey

Abstract: On the Eastern Tauride Belt, the Cretaceous calc-alkaline Karamadazı Granitoid consists of quartz diorite containing mafic microgranular enclaves (MME) and leucocratic granite. The quartz diorite consists of plagioclase (An 8-65 ), hornblende, biotite, Kfeldspar, quartz, epidote and titanite. Subrounded MME in the quartz diorite are holocrystalline, finegrained, quartz diorite to diorite in composition, and display a similar mineral assemblage to their host. Large crystals in MME and quartz diorite show variou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the spider diagram ( Figure 7 [32]) shows that both the mafic enclaves and the host rock are rich in Rb, K and other lithophile elements, as well as elements such as La, Nd, and Sm. The trace element characteristics obtained from the present study are consistent with the relative depletion of Nb, Ta, P, Ti, U, and other high field strength elements observed within the predecessors of the Lushan chicken complex in Henan [33], the Qinling ring-spotted granite [34], the Karamadaz granite body in central Turkey [35], the Wulong body in South Qinling [36], and the mafic enclaves in the Yamatu body [26] in the Wolf Mountain area of North China. The Nb/La values for the mafic enclaves are 0.42-0.81, while those for the primitive mantle are 1.04 [37] and the Nb/La value in the lower crust is 0.4 [38].…”
Section: Geochemical Characteristics Of Major Elementssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, the spider diagram ( Figure 7 [32]) shows that both the mafic enclaves and the host rock are rich in Rb, K and other lithophile elements, as well as elements such as La, Nd, and Sm. The trace element characteristics obtained from the present study are consistent with the relative depletion of Nb, Ta, P, Ti, U, and other high field strength elements observed within the predecessors of the Lushan chicken complex in Henan [33], the Qinling ring-spotted granite [34], the Karamadaz granite body in central Turkey [35], the Wulong body in South Qinling [36], and the mafic enclaves in the Yamatu body [26] in the Wolf Mountain area of North China. The Nb/La values for the mafic enclaves are 0.42-0.81, while those for the primitive mantle are 1.04 [37] and the Nb/La value in the lower crust is 0.4 [38].…”
Section: Geochemical Characteristics Of Major Elementssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although MMEs have been identified in granitic rocks around the world and have been the focus of study for several decades, their origin is still a matter of hot debate (e.g., Phillips, 1880;Grout, 1937;Didier, 1973Didier, , 1991Didier et al, 1982;Grasset and Albarède, 1994;Cheng et al, 2012;Flood and Shaw, 2014, and references therein). Several models have been proposed for the ori gin of MMEs in granitic rocks: (1) a hybrid or magma mixing and/or mingling model arguing that MMEs represent extraneous mafic magma blobs likely produced from the mantle that have mingled or partly mixed with felsic magmas derived from the crust or felsic magmas derived by fractional crystallization (e.g., Didier, 1973;Reid et al, 1983;Vernon, 1983Vernon, , 1984Vernon, , 1990Vernon, , 2014Cantagrel et al, 1984;Eberz and Nicholls, 1988;Vernon et al, 1988; Barbarin, 1990;Castro et al, 1990aCastro et al, , 1990bDorais et al, 1990;Fourcade and Javoy, 1991;Holden et al, 1991;Orsini et al, 1991;Poli and Tommasini, 1991;Elburg and Nicholls, 1995;Stimac et al, 1995;Elburg, 1996aElburg, , 1996bMaas et al, 1997;Collins et al, 2000;Ratajeski et al, 2001;Perugini et al, 2003;Tepper and Kuehner, 2004;Ilbeyli and Pearce, 2005;Kocak, 2006;Chen et al, 2009a;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in A/CNK and Y vs SiO2 diagrams ( Figure 5) two distinct group appears, which is evident also in Lu vs La, vs #mg diagrams (not shown). Existence of MMEs suggests maficfelsic interaction and mingling (Barbarin and Didier, 1992;Kocak, 2006) by injection hot mafic magma injected into felsic magma. Accordingly, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%