1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00224.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybridization in the Island Endemic, Catalina Mahogany

Abstract: Allozyme data, combined with traditional morphological and anatomical data, were used to evaluate the genetic status of the island endemic, Cercocarpus traskiae (Catalina mahogany). Comprising only seven adult plants and close to 70 seedlings, C. traskiae is confined to Wild Boar Gully on the southwest side of Santa Catalina Island in Los Angeles County, California Electrophoretic examination of 22 enzyme loci revealed that all but two of the seven adult C. traskiae trees were unique allozymically. Furthermore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, morphologically intermediate individuals may be hybrid progeny corresponding to F 2 or later generations that have lost P. dactylifera alleles by backcrossing to pure P. canariensis. As most gene flow occurs between the hybrid and a single parent (P. canariensis), the segregating generations will be mostly advanced generation backcrosses and have multilocus associations typical of the most compatible parent (P. canariensis), as suggested earlier (Rieseberg et al, 1989;Arnold et al, 1991;Nason et al, 1992;Rieseberg and Ellstrand, 1993). In addition, selection against recombinants should be intense in hybrid zones; therefore, the surviving individuals would be those that retained the ecological traits of one parent, such as backcrosses (Anderson, 1998).…”
Section: Genetic Relationships Within Among Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, morphologically intermediate individuals may be hybrid progeny corresponding to F 2 or later generations that have lost P. dactylifera alleles by backcrossing to pure P. canariensis. As most gene flow occurs between the hybrid and a single parent (P. canariensis), the segregating generations will be mostly advanced generation backcrosses and have multilocus associations typical of the most compatible parent (P. canariensis), as suggested earlier (Rieseberg et al, 1989;Arnold et al, 1991;Nason et al, 1992;Rieseberg and Ellstrand, 1993). In addition, selection against recombinants should be intense in hybrid zones; therefore, the surviving individuals would be those that retained the ecological traits of one parent, such as backcrosses (Anderson, 1998).…”
Section: Genetic Relationships Within Among Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have also been used successfully to characterise and differentiate close by related species, ecological varieties or natural and artificial hybrids (Rieseberg et al, 1989;Booij et al, 1995;Bendiab et al, 1998;Elisiário et al, 1999). Therefore, they could provide valuable insights into the genetic problems posed by the Canarian endemic P. canariensis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing enzyme gel electrophoresis it was possible to conclude that seven unique genotypes were present, two of these apparently hybrids between C. traskiae and its common sympatric congener C. betuloides ssp. blanchae (Rieseberg et al, 1989). The threat of genetic swamping of the extremely small C. traskiae gene pool was thus implicated.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybridization thus hastens the elimination of gene flow between populations, providing final closure to the speciation process. At the other extreme, hybridizing populations can fuse (Brochman 1984;Rieseberg et al 1989;Rieseberg and Gerber 1995). This mixing can occur to varying degrees, ranging from the formation of a hybrid swarm (Avise et al 1984;Roche and Roche 1991;Childs et al 1996;Williams et al 1996) to the complete genetic assimilation or replacement of one group by another (Rhymer and Simberloff 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%