Hybrid zones of Natrix helvetica and N. natrix: Phenotype data from iNaturalist and genetics reveal concordant clines and the value of species-diagnostic morphological traits
Abstract:Using georeferenced photographic records of 2944 grass snakes from Germany, Austria, and northern Italy as well as previously published mtDNA sequences (n = 1062) and microsatellite data (n = 952) for grass snakes from the same regions, we examined whether or not coloration and pattern reliably allow to differentiate between Natrix natrix and N. helvetica and if so, whether the distribution patterns revealed by phenotypes and genetics are congruent. Furthermore, we used cline analyses across hybrid zones to te… Show more
“…This is not the first instance of citizen science platforms, such as iNaturalist, being used to gain knowledge about grass snakes. In recent years, georeferenced images from these platforms have proven to be extremely valuable in providing important morphological and distributional data related to grass snakes ( Fritz & Ihlow, 2022 ; Fritz, Grismer & Asztalos, 2023 ; Jablonski et al, 2023 ).…”
Activity patterns in animals are often species-specific, and can be generally categorized as diurnal, crepuscular, or nocturnal. Understanding these patterns provides insight into ecological adaptations and behaviors. The common grass snake (Natrix natrix), one of the most common and widespread European snake species, is traditionally considered diurnal, with scarce evidence of its crepuscular and nocturnal activity. We aimed to document the distribution, environmental conditions, and potential phenotype associations of nighttime activity in N. natrix. We used citizen science data from iNaturalist (1992–2022), Observation.org (2012–2022), together with personal field observations (2010–2023) to collect 127 crepuscular and nocturnal activity records. Most observations occurred between May and August, coinciding with the peak activity period of grass snakes across their distribution range. Statistical analyses revealed no significant difference in mean daily temperatures between crepuscular and nocturnal observations. However, striped individuals displayed nocturnal activity at higher temperatures, consistent with their distribution in warmer regions, but failed to register any difference when tested on a geographic subsample, that accounted for sympatry of the phenotypes. Surprisingly, we found no significant impact of moon presence or moonlight on nighttime activity or age class, contrary to expectations based on other snake species’ responses. While our study reveals that nocturnal activity in the common grass snake is geographically widespread, further research is warranted to understand its drivers and ecological implications. This study highlights the value of citizen science platforms for biological and ecological research, offering unparalleled spatial and temporal coverage by their users. In conclusion, our work extends the knowledge of nocturnal behavior in N. natrix and underlines the critical role of citizen science in discovering behavioral aspects of common and widespread species.
“…This is not the first instance of citizen science platforms, such as iNaturalist, being used to gain knowledge about grass snakes. In recent years, georeferenced images from these platforms have proven to be extremely valuable in providing important morphological and distributional data related to grass snakes ( Fritz & Ihlow, 2022 ; Fritz, Grismer & Asztalos, 2023 ; Jablonski et al, 2023 ).…”
Activity patterns in animals are often species-specific, and can be generally categorized as diurnal, crepuscular, or nocturnal. Understanding these patterns provides insight into ecological adaptations and behaviors. The common grass snake (Natrix natrix), one of the most common and widespread European snake species, is traditionally considered diurnal, with scarce evidence of its crepuscular and nocturnal activity. We aimed to document the distribution, environmental conditions, and potential phenotype associations of nighttime activity in N. natrix. We used citizen science data from iNaturalist (1992–2022), Observation.org (2012–2022), together with personal field observations (2010–2023) to collect 127 crepuscular and nocturnal activity records. Most observations occurred between May and August, coinciding with the peak activity period of grass snakes across their distribution range. Statistical analyses revealed no significant difference in mean daily temperatures between crepuscular and nocturnal observations. However, striped individuals displayed nocturnal activity at higher temperatures, consistent with their distribution in warmer regions, but failed to register any difference when tested on a geographic subsample, that accounted for sympatry of the phenotypes. Surprisingly, we found no significant impact of moon presence or moonlight on nighttime activity or age class, contrary to expectations based on other snake species’ responses. While our study reveals that nocturnal activity in the common grass snake is geographically widespread, further research is warranted to understand its drivers and ecological implications. This study highlights the value of citizen science platforms for biological and ecological research, offering unparalleled spatial and temporal coverage by their users. In conclusion, our work extends the knowledge of nocturnal behavior in N. natrix and underlines the critical role of citizen science in discovering behavioral aspects of common and widespread species.
“…This does not contradict the validity of the involved two subspecies because morphological traits that can be distinguished by humans are neither necessarily biologically relevant nor a prerequisite for taxonomic distinctness (compare, for instance, Kindler and Fritz 2018 ; Dufresnes et al 2023 , 2024 ). Also, we could have missed some relevant traits in coloration and pattern that were only recently highlighted ( Fritz et al 2023 ). According to these authors, some individuals of N. h. sicula show a “spotted” colour pattern that never occurs in the nominotypical subspecies.…”
Most of Switzerland is inhabited by the nominotypical subspecies of the barred grass snake (Natrix helvetica helvetica), which is characterized by mitochondrial DNA lineage E. Only in the northeast of the country, the common grass snake (N. natrix) occurs and hybridizes with N. h. helvetica in a narrow contact zone. However, we discovered that in southern and western Switzerland barred grass snakes representing another mtDNA lineage (lineage C) are widely distributed. Lineage C is typical for Alpine populations of the southern subspecies N. h. sicula. Our microsatellite analyses of the Swiss samples revealed differences between the two subspecies and also a substructure with two clusters in each subspecies. Furthermore, we discovered a contact and hybrid zone of N. h. helvetica and N. h. sicula along the northern shore of Lake Geneva and also confirm that interbreeding with alien common grass snakes (N. n. moreotica, mtDNA lineage 7) occurs there. This finding is of concern for nature conservation and measures should be taken to prevent further genetic pollution. Using morphometrics, we found no differences between the two subspecies of N. helvetica, while N. natrix was slightly distinct from N. helvetica.
“…This does not contradict the validity of the involved two subspecies because morphological traits that can be distinguished by humans are neither necessarily biologically relevant nor a prerequisite for taxonomic distinctness (compare, for instance, Kindler and Fritz 2018;Dufresnes et al 2023Dufresnes et al , 2024. Also, we could have missed some relevant traits in coloration and pattern that were only recently highlighted (Fritz et al 2023).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.