2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2016.0740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid WPT‐BDCT transform for high‐quality image compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the winding approach, there are other classification criteria that explain the majority of the winding methods available. The nature of winding is additionally affected by the number of spatially turning axes used to wrap the fiber around the mandrel [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. All of these criteria allow for procedural differentiation and the allocation of typical topological appearances to the different composite components produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the winding approach, there are other classification criteria that explain the majority of the winding methods available. The nature of winding is additionally affected by the number of spatially turning axes used to wrap the fiber around the mandrel [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. All of these criteria allow for procedural differentiation and the allocation of typical topological appearances to the different composite components produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DCT and DWT compression technique are applied for each format and the results show that the size of the compressed image is able to reduce by about 96.92% and 99.8% from its original image, thus a good quality of image have been developed. Moreover, the results obtained show better PSNR value compared to [25], [26] and DCT in [27] while for [28] and [29] shows good PSNR value and compression ratio by applying hybrid method. Therefore, a hybrid compression method is proposed to realize higher compression of the input image and reduce larger space of image's data storage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since the JPEG coder is one of the popular DCT‐ITCs [2], hence the obtained quantisation tablesgiven in (17) and (18) are compared against thedefault quantisation table of JPEG standard (JPEG‐DQT) [2], given as JPEGDQT=][1em4pt1611101624405161121214192658605514131624405769561417222951878062182237566810910377243555648110411392496478871031211201017292959811210010399. However, to compress the test NOB of Lena image at 0.3 bpp, wehave to scale the JPEG‐DQT shown in (19). Hence, the JPEG‐DQT has been scaled by a factor of 6.5 as shownin (20), to get the desiredcompression of the test NOB.…”
Section: Proposed Iioniba Technique For the Dct‐itcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transform coding is an important technique for visual data compression applications [1, 2]. Particularly, the discrete cosine transform (DCT)‐based coders, like JPEG [3–6], MPEG‐2 [7], H.263 [8], H.264 [9], and H.265 [10] are much popular than the others due to their low complexity and low‐cost implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%