Hybrid vapor stripping–vapor permeation process for recovery and dehydration of 1‐butanol and acetone/butanol/ethanol from dilute aqueous solutions. Part 1. Process Simulations
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Fermentative production of butanol is limited to low concentrations, typically less than 2 wt% solvent, due to product inhibition. The result is high separation energy demand by conventional distillation approaches, despite favorable vapor-liquid equilibrium and partial miscibility with water. In previous work, a process integrating steam stripping, vapor compression, and vapor permeation separation was proposed for separating ethanol from water. Such a membrane assisted vapor stripping (MAVS) proc… Show more
“…Similarly, 1 MJ of delivered steam heat corresponded to 1.11 MJ of fuel‐equivalents due to an assumed 90% boiler efficiency. As in our previous work, we employed the UNIQUAC thermodynamic model with 1‐butanol/water parameters from Fischer and Gmehling and values from the DECHEMA Chemistry Data Series for the ethanol/water and acetone/water pairs …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline membrane has a water/1‐butanol molar permselectivity of 1000 and a water permeance of 7774 GPU (2.6 × 10 −6 kmol/m 2 ·s·kPa). These values were chosen to match the permeances used in our previous simulation papers on this subject to present a consistent set of baseline simulations . They represent the general properties of a 2 µm thick poly(allyl amine‐hydrochloride)‐poly(vinyl alcohol) blend selective layer developed in our laboratory with water and alcohol permeabilities of 5.2 × 10 −12 and 5.2 × 10 −15 kmol · m/m 2 · s · kPa, respectively .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subject of this paper is one such synergistic hybrid, termed Membrane Assisted Vapor Stripping (MAVS), combining distillation‐based vapor stripping and membrane‐based vapor permeation in a manner that significantly reduces energy usage for the recovery of volatile solvents and biofuels from water . A schematic diagram of a ‘2nd generation’ MAVS process is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous publications on the subject, we have described the general theory behind MAVS processes, simulation predictions for performance and initial cost estimates, energy demand, and experimental verifications for ethanol/water, 1‐butanol/water, and acetone/1‐butanol/ethanol/water (ABE/water) systems . In this paper, we evaluate the effect of a variety of process variables and membrane performance/unit cost characteristics on energy usage and the overall separation cost for MAVS systems.…”
BACKGROUND
Alcohols, including ethanol and butanol, are receiving increased attention as renewable liquid biofuels. Alcohol concentrations may be low in a biological process due to product inhibition and, for non‐starch feedstocks, limited substrate concentrations. The result is high separation energy demand by conventional distillation scenarios, despite favorable vapor–liquid equilibrium and, for butanol, partial miscibility with water. A hybrid vapor stripping–vapor permeation process, termed membrane assisted vapor stripping (MAVS), incorporating a fractional condensation step was found to be at least 65% more energy efficient than conventional distillation approaches. The effect of process design, component performance, and capacity changes on the energy usage and processing cost of MAVS systems for separating ethanol, 1‐butanol, and acetone/butanol/ethanol (ABE) mixtures from water was studied.
RESULTS
For the recovery of 1‐butanol from a 1 wt% aqueous solution, the 99.5 wt% 1‐butanol product contained 7.0 times as much heating value energy as the MAVS process required to recover and dry it. The calculated cost to perform this separation was 0.126 US$ kg−1‐product (0.102 US$ L−1) for a heating value cost of 3.69 US$ GJ−1, far below the current values for crude oil and conventionally‐produced ethanol. Energy (electricity, natural gas) was 23% of this cost. The largest capital cost item was the compressor on the overhead vapor stream from the stripping column. Capital costs for membranes/modules was the 6th highest cost category, representing only 4% of the capital cost. A 10‐fold increase in membrane cost caused the cost of production to increase 38%.
CONCLUSION
Hybrid MAVS processes are an energy‐ and cost‐efficient means to recover alcohols from water. Despite recent fluctuations, fossil fuel costs are projected to increase. Thus processes utilizing mechanical energy to recapture and transfer thermal energy, including MAVS, should have a greater cost advantage in the future. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
“…Similarly, 1 MJ of delivered steam heat corresponded to 1.11 MJ of fuel‐equivalents due to an assumed 90% boiler efficiency. As in our previous work, we employed the UNIQUAC thermodynamic model with 1‐butanol/water parameters from Fischer and Gmehling and values from the DECHEMA Chemistry Data Series for the ethanol/water and acetone/water pairs …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline membrane has a water/1‐butanol molar permselectivity of 1000 and a water permeance of 7774 GPU (2.6 × 10 −6 kmol/m 2 ·s·kPa). These values were chosen to match the permeances used in our previous simulation papers on this subject to present a consistent set of baseline simulations . They represent the general properties of a 2 µm thick poly(allyl amine‐hydrochloride)‐poly(vinyl alcohol) blend selective layer developed in our laboratory with water and alcohol permeabilities of 5.2 × 10 −12 and 5.2 × 10 −15 kmol · m/m 2 · s · kPa, respectively .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subject of this paper is one such synergistic hybrid, termed Membrane Assisted Vapor Stripping (MAVS), combining distillation‐based vapor stripping and membrane‐based vapor permeation in a manner that significantly reduces energy usage for the recovery of volatile solvents and biofuels from water . A schematic diagram of a ‘2nd generation’ MAVS process is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous publications on the subject, we have described the general theory behind MAVS processes, simulation predictions for performance and initial cost estimates, energy demand, and experimental verifications for ethanol/water, 1‐butanol/water, and acetone/1‐butanol/ethanol/water (ABE/water) systems . In this paper, we evaluate the effect of a variety of process variables and membrane performance/unit cost characteristics on energy usage and the overall separation cost for MAVS systems.…”
BACKGROUND
Alcohols, including ethanol and butanol, are receiving increased attention as renewable liquid biofuels. Alcohol concentrations may be low in a biological process due to product inhibition and, for non‐starch feedstocks, limited substrate concentrations. The result is high separation energy demand by conventional distillation scenarios, despite favorable vapor–liquid equilibrium and, for butanol, partial miscibility with water. A hybrid vapor stripping–vapor permeation process, termed membrane assisted vapor stripping (MAVS), incorporating a fractional condensation step was found to be at least 65% more energy efficient than conventional distillation approaches. The effect of process design, component performance, and capacity changes on the energy usage and processing cost of MAVS systems for separating ethanol, 1‐butanol, and acetone/butanol/ethanol (ABE) mixtures from water was studied.
RESULTS
For the recovery of 1‐butanol from a 1 wt% aqueous solution, the 99.5 wt% 1‐butanol product contained 7.0 times as much heating value energy as the MAVS process required to recover and dry it. The calculated cost to perform this separation was 0.126 US$ kg−1‐product (0.102 US$ L−1) for a heating value cost of 3.69 US$ GJ−1, far below the current values for crude oil and conventionally‐produced ethanol. Energy (electricity, natural gas) was 23% of this cost. The largest capital cost item was the compressor on the overhead vapor stream from the stripping column. Capital costs for membranes/modules was the 6th highest cost category, representing only 4% of the capital cost. A 10‐fold increase in membrane cost caused the cost of production to increase 38%.
CONCLUSION
Hybrid MAVS processes are an energy‐ and cost‐efficient means to recover alcohols from water. Despite recent fluctuations, fossil fuel costs are projected to increase. Thus processes utilizing mechanical energy to recapture and transfer thermal energy, including MAVS, should have a greater cost advantage in the future. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
“…For instance, in the fuel and biofuel industry or chemicals and polymers production, these kinds of water + alcohol + solvent mixtures with a VLLE behaviour have to be purified by using different techniques, such as azeotropic distillation, liquidliquid extraction, extractive distillation, adsorption, pervaporation, etc. [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
Simultaneous correlation of vapour-liquid-liquid equilibrium (VLLE) data is hardly ever attempted in literature with one common set of parameters for all the equilibrium regions present in the systems. It is common practice to obtain different sets of parameters for VLE, LLE and VLLE regions when experimental equilibrium data for ternary systems are fitted with a given model (e.g. an activity coefficient model for the liquid phase). Besides, when dealing with the correlation of VLE for ternary systems, it is quite frequent to obtain different sets of parameters for each one of the three binary subsystems from those obtained when exclusively binary VLE data are correlated. In
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.