2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45873-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid System Models of Navigation Strategies for Games and Animations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experience shows that CHARON simulations of formally specified animation systems often take longer than simulations of equivalent systems coded outside of CHARON [3]. Briefly, we believe the reasons for this are largely related to the differences in primary goals of the two disciplines, hybrid systems and animation.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our experience shows that CHARON simulations of formally specified animation systems often take longer than simulations of equivalent systems coded outside of CHARON [3]. Briefly, we believe the reasons for this are largely related to the differences in primary goals of the two disciplines, hybrid systems and animation.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is not necessarily obvious, however, how to represent such high-level strategies in a hybrid automaton model that retains the reactive/behavioral flavor of our low-level navigation system. (See [3] for discussion. )…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These systems provide some specification tools similar to our EquationalReset scheme; however, they appear to provide little or no support for specifying the kinds of temporal relationships that can be expressed using our ConditionalTermination and TemporalProjection schemata. Applications of Charon to computer animation are discussed in [Aaron, et al 2001] and [Aaron, et al 2002]. This work uses Charon to model low-level and high-level navigation strategies for virtual agents operating in a two-dimensional world.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some use program scheme instantiation and transformation techniques that are similar to the methods of our implementation rules; however, the applications are generally quite different. SciNapse uses a knowledge base of transformation rules implemented in Mathematica to generate programs that solve partial differential equations [Kant, 1993], [Akers et al, 1998]. Amphion uses deductive synthesis to generate programs utilizing libraries of astronomical software [Lowry et al, 1994].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%