2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Simulation of Small-Scale Steel Braced Frame Subjected to Fire and Fire Following Earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A hybrid simulation framework was developed and illustrated with a test of a small-scale specimen (Memari et al, 2020). The four-story special concentrically braced frame (SCBF) building was 5 ft × 5 ft in plan, with four bays in each direction.…”
Section: Multi-hazard Simulation and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A hybrid simulation framework was developed and illustrated with a test of a small-scale specimen (Memari et al, 2020). The four-story special concentrically braced frame (SCBF) building was 5 ft × 5 ft in plan, with four bays in each direction.…”
Section: Multi-hazard Simulation and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of residual interstory drift proved to be a significant factor in the fire performance of the column. Additional details and commentary on future studies can be found in Memari et al (2020). (Quiel and Garlock, 2010).…”
Section: Multi-hazard Simulation and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the purely numerical configuration, however, the behaviour of the fire-exposed part must be modelled analytically too, which introduces uncertainty to the results (mainly because of the lack of realistic temperatureand time-dependent calibration data for the constitutive material models), that is, by design of the method eliminated in the hybrid configuration. For this reason, hybrid testing has lately attracted the interest of several researchers in structural fire engineering, leading to numerous conference contributions [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and several different approaches [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. However, a detailed and methodical review of existing approaches in [42] shows that these contributions still have, in aggregate, the following drawbacks: (1) they either lack the necessary theoretical rigour or ignore fundamentals of the well-established hybrid testing method as founded in the field of earthquake engineering (refer to [43] for an excellent review of these principles); (2) or they were only verified using over-simplified laboratory experiments, during which only relatively low elevated temperature levels were reached and, therefore, did not cover the entire range of temperaturedependent material behaviours that are relevant in structural fire engineering problems; or (3) they directly attempted to set up a hybrid fire test with full-scale structural members before exploring the fundamentals through meaningful lab-scale proof-of-concept problems (refer to [42] for a more detailed discussion including a historical overview on pioneering research from the 1980s and 1990s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the hybrid test, the numerical model for the soil-structure interaction (SSI) of the bridge was also included. Furthermore, the philosophy of hybrid simulation has not been limited to structural and earthquake engineering, but it was extended to other areas of study such as thermo-mechanical testing, industrial piping systems and multihazard testing [7][8][9]. It also motivated small laboratories to actively engage in research using their limited equipment, including participation in geographically distributed hybrid testing projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%