2016
DOI: 10.1080/14678802.2016.1136137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid security governance in Africa: rethinking the foundations of security, justice and legitimate public authority

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hybrid security governance refers to the multiplicity of sites of political authority and governance where security is implemented and negotiated (Bagayoko et al 2016). In this paper, it is used to refer to the interwoven relationships and interactions between formal and informal institutions and the processes that deliver security, justice and governance services.…”
Section: Approach and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid security governance refers to the multiplicity of sites of political authority and governance where security is implemented and negotiated (Bagayoko et al 2016). In this paper, it is used to refer to the interwoven relationships and interactions between formal and informal institutions and the processes that deliver security, justice and governance services.…”
Section: Approach and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contexts of pluralism, formal and informal governance systems do not necessarily feed into each other in predictable ways, and neither is inherently conducive to meaningful public oversight (Bagayoko et al 2016). It is vital for SSR practitioners to contribute to fostering an environment in which all security actors are subordinated to citizen control and oversight.…”
Section: Priority 1: Strengthen Civic Space and Institutionalized Mecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advantages notwithstanding, coercive actors operating outside the purview of the state are often associated with discriminatory and unaccountable security provision (Bagayoko et al 2016) and human rights violations (Kirsch and Gratz 2010;Arias 2006), and ultimately prolong and increase insecurity over time, despite periodic contributions to stability (Meagher 2012). Some security providers command the state's recognition, sponsorship, or tolerance, collaborating with its courts and police services to co-produce public goods; some are exploited, with the state co-opting them to project its rule; others are ignored, marginalized, isolated, criminalized, or violently subverted.…”
Section: Perspectives On Security Pluralismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, there can be mutually beneficial exchanges of economic, cultural and symbolic capital. Local policing providers may also overlap in their practices, as they sometimes borrow 'successful' or locally recognised processes that have no history in their own institution (Bagayoko et al 2016). For users, 'multi-choice policing' (Baker 2008) may offer the advantages of 'forum shopping' or the disadvantages of weak enforcement outside limited and fluid jurisdictions.…”
Section: The Diversity Of Policing In Conflict Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%