43rd Fluid Dynamics Conference 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-2483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Reynolds-Averaged and Large-Eddy Simulations of a Supersonic Cavity Flameholder

Abstract: Simulation results are presented for non-reacting flow within a supersonic cavity flameholder. The freestream is air at Mach 2. A case is simulated with no fuel injection, and two cases are simulated with different rates of ethylene fuel injected through holes located on the back face of the cavity. The simulations correspond to a series of experiments for which particle image velocimetry measurements of two velocity components were made within the cavity. Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations are used t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…domain width that encompasses two full injection ports. This domain matches that used in previous improved delayed detached-eddy simulation studies [12,13] for this configuration. As mentioned previously, Peterson et al [12] included a comparison of results using this domain width with those obtained using the full facility width with side-wall effects.…”
Section: Computational Grid Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…domain width that encompasses two full injection ports. This domain matches that used in previous improved delayed detached-eddy simulation studies [12,13] for this configuration. As mentioned previously, Peterson et al [12] included a comparison of results using this domain width with those obtained using the full facility width with side-wall effects.…”
Section: Computational Grid Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Pressure data in the immediate vicinity of the cavity indicate even smaller changes, suggesting that the particular region of interest of the flowfield is not appreciably affected by the seeding method used. This result is confirmed by recent CFD analysis 27,28 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Pressure data in the immediate vicinity of the cavity indicate even smaller changes, suggesting that the particular region of interest of the flowfield is not appreciably affected by the seeding method used. This conclusion was confirmed by recent computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis [29].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%