2016
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2015.2472963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Probabilistic Wind Power Forecasting Using Temporally Local Gaussian Process

Abstract: The demand for sustainable development has resulted in a rapid growth in wind power worldwide. Although various approaches have been proposed to improve the accuracy and to overcome the uncertainties associated with traditional methods, the stochastic and variable nature of wind still remains the most challenging issue in accurately forecasting wind power. This paper presents a hybrid deterministic-probabilistic method where a temporally local "moving window" technique is used in Gaussian process (GP) to exami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4.4 we also evaluate the significance of our hybrid approach within AdaHeat+. It is worth noting that the performance of our simple hybrid GP-based approach is in alignment to the literature [Chen et al 2014] and also outperforms far more complex GP-based approaches (in terms of RMSE throughout the predictive horizon examined) evaluated in the proximity of our region of interest (and, in particular, in Ireland) [Yan et al 2016;Yan et al 2014]. …”
Section: Instantiating Our Approachsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…4.4 we also evaluate the significance of our hybrid approach within AdaHeat+. It is worth noting that the performance of our simple hybrid GP-based approach is in alignment to the literature [Chen et al 2014] and also outperforms far more complex GP-based approaches (in terms of RMSE throughout the predictive horizon examined) evaluated in the proximity of our region of interest (and, in particular, in Ireland) [Yan et al 2016;Yan et al 2014]. …”
Section: Instantiating Our Approachsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…, T ], produced by those households m ∈ M owning RESs is considered predicted with sufficient accuracy over the whole period T , hence it is considered known as well. Methods for prediction of residential electricity demand and of renewable energy generation are proposed, for example, in [16], [17] and [18], [19], respectively. Note that for those households from the set M that do not own RESs, but only ESSs, the renewable energy vector is zero, i.e.…”
Section: B the Energy Consumption Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final set of constraints for this problem is (1)- (3), (5)- (8), (17) and (18). The set of solution variables is {b n , r m , s m , a n } M m=1 , N n=1 .…”
Section: Coalitional Cost Minimization Problem For the Whole Commumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in a comparative study, Conditional Parametric Quantile Regression (CP/QR) model was found to outperform Censored Normal (CN) distribution-based Conditional Parametric Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (CP/ARCH) model for five-hourahead stochastic wind forecasting [234]. Moreover, time-adaptive Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) [235], Temporarily Local Gaussian Process (TLGP) [236], two-parameter Weibull distribution [237], Generalised Pareto Distribution (GPD) [238], and sparse Bayesian classification (SBC) with Dempster-Shafer theory (DSF) [239] have been introduced with satisfactory wind forecasting performance level.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%