2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid PET-CT simulation for radiation treatment planning in head-and-neck cancers: A brief technical report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
59
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported that nodal volume parameter was decreased in 3 cases, increased in 9 cases and was unchanged in 3 cases. They also stated that there was no significant difference in terms of nodal involvement areas (Heron DE, et al 2004). In our study, GTVLNPET/CT was larger in 20 cases (54%) and smaller in 12 cases (32.5%) when compared to GTVLN CT .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They reported that nodal volume parameter was decreased in 3 cases, increased in 9 cases and was unchanged in 3 cases. They also stated that there was no significant difference in terms of nodal involvement areas (Heron DE, et al 2004). In our study, GTVLNPET/CT was larger in 20 cases (54%) and smaller in 12 cases (32.5%) when compared to GTVLN CT .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are studies reporting both an increase and a decrease in the target volume (Daisne et al, 2004;Heron et al, 2004;Van Baardwijk, 2004;Paulino et al, 2005;Schwartz et al, 2005). In the literature, this change in the GTV is reported as mostly decreasing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when used together MRI, CT, and PET each can add complimentary data to improve tumor delineation [25]. While most studies examining PET alone based GTVs are usually smaller then their counterpart CT based GTVs, in ∼25% of patients of cases the additional information obtained from PET can increase the GTV compared to CT alone based GTVs [10][11][12][13]15,[26][27][28]. In addition, this number can increase to up to 64% depending on the SUV threshold used [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selon plusieurs publications, la prise en compte des données de la TEP-FDG a entraîné un changement de protocole thérapeutique dans environ 20 % des cas. Ces changements concernent plus le traitement des aires ganglionnaires (aboutissant le plus souvent à une augmentation qu'à une diminution des champs d'irradiation initialement prévus) que celui de la tumeur [14]. Cette application est encore du domaine de la recherche ; d'autres études sont nécessaires pour mieux préciser les limites des lésions fournies pas la TEP-TDM.…”
Section: Optimisation Des Champs De Radiothérapieunclassified