2010
DOI: 10.2514/1.45096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Particle-in-Cell Simulations of Magnetic Sail in Laboratory Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result shows the drag coefficient is 2.9 (note that the drag coefficient in Fig. 6 is converted using the definition of C D by Fujita [11] and Kajimura et al [16]); our result is in good agreement with the results from the kinetic simulations (C D 3:2 0:4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our result shows the drag coefficient is 2.9 (note that the drag coefficient in Fig. 6 is converted using the definition of C D by Fujita [11] and Kajimura et al [16]); our result is in good agreement with the results from the kinetic simulations (C D 3:2 0:4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Fujita [11] and Kajimura et al [16] conducted three-dimensional kinetic simulations for wide range of the plasma interaction scale (from the ion kinetic scale to the MHD scale) for the case of 90 deg, and the drag coefficient in the MHD scale was reported as 3.6 by Fujita [11] and 3.0 by Kajimura et al [16]. Our result shows the drag coefficient is 2.9 (note that the drag coefficient in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Another approach to obtaining the electric and magnetic fields is to directly solve Faraday's law and Ampere's law in Maxwell's equations [9]. The model is called the EM model, and it was used in the full particle and particle-fluid hybrid modeling of magnetic sails [8,10]. It was reported that the ESMS model yields almost the same thrust as the EM model in the full particle simulations of a 2D magnetic sail, for which the condition number is 600 [11].…”
Section: Iib Em Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seeing the detail of Fig.17, however, one can see that laboratory experiment shows rather small thrust level than that by numerial simulation. This discrepancy is caused as a result of the collisional effect that is inevitable in laboratory [Kajimura et al, 2010], and it means that the laboratory experiment cannot predict the entire feature of collisionless plasmas in space.…”
Section: Thrust Measurement Of Magsailmentioning
confidence: 99%