2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface to Improve Usability for People With Severe Motor Disability: Electromyographic Signals for Error Correction During a Spelling Task

Abstract: The proposed hybrid BCI control modality could provide end-users with severe motor disability with an option to exploit some residual muscular activity, which could not be fully reliable for properly controlling an assistive technology device. The findings reported in this pilot study encourage the implementation of a clinical trial involving a large cohort of end-users.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
52
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, two or more brain imaging methods can be combined in a hybrid BCI such that brain signals from an EEG and fNIRS system in order to take advantage of each brain imaging technology [41,72–75]. Some research studies applied other physiological signals, such as electromyography (EMG) [32,76], electrooculogram (EOG) [77,78] and electrocardiography (ECG) [31,79] to brain signal(s) to address common limitations of brain signals, such as lower amplitude, non-stationarity, and vulnerability to muscle artifact. In addition, external signals can be added to support BCI systems including eye-tracking [71,80], a gyroscope [81], a position sensor [82], and a joystick [83,84].…”
Section: Study 1: Taxonomy Of Hybrid Bcismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, two or more brain imaging methods can be combined in a hybrid BCI such that brain signals from an EEG and fNIRS system in order to take advantage of each brain imaging technology [41,72–75]. Some research studies applied other physiological signals, such as electromyography (EMG) [32,76], electrooculogram (EOG) [77,78] and electrocardiography (ECG) [31,79] to brain signal(s) to address common limitations of brain signals, such as lower amplitude, non-stationarity, and vulnerability to muscle artifact. In addition, external signals can be added to support BCI systems including eye-tracking [71,80], a gyroscope [81], a position sensor [82], and a joystick [83,84].…”
Section: Study 1: Taxonomy Of Hybrid Bcismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, EEG and fNIRS could be used complementary to one another to measure brain signal features, because EEG has high temporal resolution and low spatial resolution while fNIRS has high spatial resolution and low temporal resolution [41,72–75]. A multi-physiological acquisition method has the advantage of higher classification accuracy due to not only the application of the classification result with additional physiological signals, but also the high signal-to-noise ratio of EMG and EOG signal [32,7678]. Contrary to the combinations of physiological signals, external inputs including joysticks, eye trackers, and gyroscopes are directly utilized as a controller by modulating hand or body movements for directional applications such as a navigation [59], robot control [91] and game control [83].…”
Section: Study 1: Taxonomy Of Hybrid Bcismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, a BCI is defined as “ a system that measures Central Nervous System (CNS) activity and converts it into artificial output that replaces, restores, enhances or improves natural CNS output and thereby changes the ongoing interactions between the CNS and its external or internal environment” (Wolpaw and Wolpaw, 2012). Such definition summarizes the progresses of the scientific community in this field during the last decades, since at the moment the possibility of using the BCI systems outside the laboratories (Aloise et al, 2010; Blankertz et al, 2010; Aricò et al, 2011; Riccio et al, 2015; Schettini et al, 2015), by developing applications in everyday life is not just a theory but something very close to real applications (Zander et al, 2009; Blankertz et al, 2010; Aricò et al, 2016). This technology has been defined passive Brain-Computer Interface (pBCI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results that have been obtained in the past several years have demonstrated the possibility of performing complex tasks by relying on noninvasive EEG systems, highlighting the potential of BCI as an assistive technology (AT) option (Kleih et al, 2011;McFarland et al, 2008;Riccio et al, 2015;Schettini et al, 2015). Similarly, encouraging results have been generated with noninvasive BCI systems in stroke rehabilitation RamosMurguialday et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%