2018
DOI: 10.5114/aic.2018.74362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid one-day coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid artery stenting – cardiac surgeons’ perspective on the procedure’s safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This minimally invasive approach, ‘combining the best with best’ appears at an immediate line to be ideal for patients at increased risk for CEA who are not suitable for transfemoral access. This is particularly relevant as the use of large-bore flow clamping/reversal catheters through the transradial route is debatable because of an increased risk of the radial artery damage, its elimination as a potential arterial graft [ 33 ], and an increased risk of the radial access patency loss. The strategy described in the present communication may well be applied to other high-risk patient groups [ 33 ] and it has the potential to become the patient-preferred strategy over CEA [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This minimally invasive approach, ‘combining the best with best’ appears at an immediate line to be ideal for patients at increased risk for CEA who are not suitable for transfemoral access. This is particularly relevant as the use of large-bore flow clamping/reversal catheters through the transradial route is debatable because of an increased risk of the radial artery damage, its elimination as a potential arterial graft [ 33 ], and an increased risk of the radial access patency loss. The strategy described in the present communication may well be applied to other high-risk patient groups [ 33 ] and it has the potential to become the patient-preferred strategy over CEA [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly relevant as the use of large-bore flow clamping/reversal catheters through the transradial route is debatable because of an increased risk of the radial artery damage, its elimination as a potential arterial graft [ 33 ], and an increased risk of the radial access patency loss. The strategy described in the present communication may well be applied to other high-risk patient groups [ 33 ] and it has the potential to become the patient-preferred strategy over CEA [ 34 ]. It needs to be undertood that the neck base is not (with the cuttent technologies at least) the area for any routine percutaneous asscess.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure of this hybrid treatment was established in several studies. The inclusion of the antithrombotic regimen balances the risk of bleeding during surgery and thrombosis after stenting (55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60). Based on available data, this procedure is safe and effective in such patients.…”
Section: Management With MI Cardio-cerebral Infarctionmentioning
confidence: 99%