2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid neuromusculoskeletal modeling to best track joint moments using a balance between muscle excitations derived from electromyograms and optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
205
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
205
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The motor neuron discharges were converted into continuous neural activations using a twitch model based on a time-history dependent recursive filter and a non-linear transfer function 48 . Experimental joint angles were used as input to a multidimensional cubic B-splines set that synthetized the OpenSim subject-specific geometry of muscle-tendon units and computed their resulting length and moment arms 49,50 . Neural activations and muscletendon unit length were used to control a Hill-type muscle model and estimate instantaneous length, contraction velocity, and force in the muscle fibers, and strain and force in the series-elastic tendon within each muscle-tendon unit 49 .…”
Section: Model-based Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motor neuron discharges were converted into continuous neural activations using a twitch model based on a time-history dependent recursive filter and a non-linear transfer function 48 . Experimental joint angles were used as input to a multidimensional cubic B-splines set that synthetized the OpenSim subject-specific geometry of muscle-tendon units and computed their resulting length and moment arms 49,50 . Neural activations and muscletendon unit length were used to control a Hill-type muscle model and estimate instantaneous length, contraction velocity, and force in the muscle fibers, and strain and force in the series-elastic tendon within each muscle-tendon unit 49 .…”
Section: Model-based Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It employs a nonlinear least-squares optimization procedure to identify parameters that vary nonlinearly across subjects including: EMG-to-activation parameters, MTU optimal fibre length, tendon slack length and maximal isometric force. The open-loop formulation is then generalized into a closed-loop modelling formulation [60]. This accounts for surface EMG uncertainties that may contribute to bias the model-based joint dynamics estimates including cross-talk and filtering artefacts as well as the inability to access deeply located muscles.…”
Section: Open-loop and Closed-loop Formulations Of Emg-informed Muscumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted μ values were all above 0.80 (0.81-1.0), 3.05 for load holding close to the chest, 40.9, 10.9, 7.9, and 5.4 for load holding at different heights from 90 to 180 cm indicating that computed muscle forces are much less compatible with recorded EMG for tasks in upright postures. Table 3 Predictions for the global muscle forces (right/left sides), sum of global ( F G ), local lumbar ( F L ) and total muscle forces ( F T ) on both sides, local spinal loads (compression and posterior-anterior shear forces positive in downward and anterior directions, respectively) at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc mid-heights, and L4-L5 intradiscal pressure (IDP) values for holding 10 Unstable 20°Stable Unstable Unstable Stable 30°Stable Stable Stable Stable 40°Stable Stable Stable Stable 50°Stable Stable Stable Stable 60°Stable Stable Stable Stable 70°Stable Stable Stable Stable 80°Stable Stable Stable Stable a The smallest eigenvalue of the Hessian matrix is equal to zero (Meta stable), smaller than zero (Unstable), or greater than zero (Stable).…”
Section: Tasks In Upright Posturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid, i.e. EMG-assisted optimization (EMGAO), approaches have consequently been introduced to improve model predictions by simultaneous consideration of both EMG signals and equilibrium requirements [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%