2005
DOI: 10.3182/20050703-6-cz-1902.02230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Neural Network Models of Bioprocesses: A Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…artificial neural networks (Chen et al, 2000), Gaussian process (GP) models (Del Rio-Chanona et al, 2019;Bradford et al, 2018). Black models have satisfactory modeling performance after careful training with the experimental data (Grosfils et al, 2005). However, they are totally data-driven approaches with little biological interpretations, even though some of them are hybrid (Von Stosch et al, 2014;Fiedler and Schuppert, 2008), e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…artificial neural networks (Chen et al, 2000), Gaussian process (GP) models (Del Rio-Chanona et al, 2019;Bradford et al, 2018). Black models have satisfactory modeling performance after careful training with the experimental data (Grosfils et al, 2005). However, they are totally data-driven approaches with little biological interpretations, even though some of them are hybrid (Von Stosch et al, 2014;Fiedler and Schuppert, 2008), e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%