2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid multiscale simulation of a mixing-controlled reaction

Abstract: a b s t r a c tContinuum-scale models, which employ a porous medium conceptualization to represent properties and processes averaged over a large number of solid grains and pore spaces, are widely used to study subsurface flow and reactive transport. Recently, pore-scale models, which explicitly resolve individual soil grains and pores, have been developed to more accurately model and study pore-scale phenomena, such as mineral precipitation and dissolution reactions, microbially-mediated surface reactions, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key advantage of particle methods such as 20 SPH and LBM [33] is in their ability to advect mass with each particle, thus 21 removing the need to explicitly track phase interfaces for problems involv- were also successfully simulated to show the capability of the model. It also 6 pointed out the high computational cost of the SPH model, which could be 7 partially overcome by using parallel computing. In the more recent review of The fourth major pore-scale modeling approach considered here -pore- PDEs for the pore-network model reduces to simultaneous solution of a set of 18 analytical models for flow in each network element, the pore-network method 19 is significantly less computationally demanding than the other approaches, 20 and has been successfully applied to a broad range of problem types (e.g., Each pore-scale numerical approach mentioned above has strengths in 4 areas such as accuracy, flexibility, computational speed, or scalability.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A key advantage of particle methods such as 20 SPH and LBM [33] is in their ability to advect mass with each particle, thus 21 removing the need to explicitly track phase interfaces for problems involv- were also successfully simulated to show the capability of the model. It also 6 pointed out the high computational cost of the SPH model, which could be 7 partially overcome by using parallel computing. In the more recent review of The fourth major pore-scale modeling approach considered here -pore- PDEs for the pore-network model reduces to simultaneous solution of a set of 18 analytical models for flow in each network element, the pore-network method 19 is significantly less computationally demanding than the other approaches, 20 and has been successfully applied to a broad range of problem types (e.g., Each pore-scale numerical approach mentioned above has strengths in 4 areas such as accuracy, flexibility, computational speed, or scalability.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…DNS approaches include standard computational fluid dy-4 namics (CFD) [24], lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) [25][26][27], and smoothed 5 particle hydrodynamics (SPH) [28]. The second class of model represents the 6 pore space as a network connected by geometrically simplified pore bodies 7 and pore throats, and most commonly takes the form of pore-network mod-8 els (PNM) [29]. Both flow and transport processes can be represented using 9 either of these approaches.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They deal with chemical reactivity either in a stochastic manner, representing reactivity with molecular analogies, or in classical approaches by means of concentrations Cirpka et al, 2012;Ding et al, 2013;Hayek et al, 2012;Knutson et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2013). Extensions are both required for application purposes and attractive for capturing the consequences of anomalous transport to potential "anomalous" and enhanced reactivity (Battiato et al, 2009;Sadhukhan et al, 2014;Scheibe et al, 2015;Tartakovsky et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%