Modelling for Water Resource Recovery 2024
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2022.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid modelling of water resource recovery facilities: status and opportunities

Abstract: Mathematical modelling is an indispensable tool to support water resource recovery facility (WRRF) operators and engineers with the ambition of creating a truly circular economy and assuring a sustainable future. Despite the successful application of mechanistic models in the water sector, they show some important limitations and do not fully profit from the increasing digitalisation of systems and processes. Recent advances in data-driven methods have provided options for harnessing the power of Industry 4.0,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While combining these processes follows a mechanistic approach, the modelling of the disinfection process itself (Chick-Watson) is phenomenological (data-derived). Such hybrid models, building on understanding of mechanisms in combination with data-driven methods, are increasingly used to model water reuse systems, as they combine the advantages of mechanistic (interpretability of results and extrapolation power) with those of data-driven models (e.g., learning unknown relationships) (Schneider et al, 2022).…”
Section: Comparison Of Logistic Regression and A Mechanism-based Mode...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While combining these processes follows a mechanistic approach, the modelling of the disinfection process itself (Chick-Watson) is phenomenological (data-derived). Such hybrid models, building on understanding of mechanisms in combination with data-driven methods, are increasingly used to model water reuse systems, as they combine the advantages of mechanistic (interpretability of results and extrapolation power) with those of data-driven models (e.g., learning unknown relationships) (Schneider et al, 2022).…”
Section: Comparison Of Logistic Regression and A Mechanism-based Mode...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 In addition, despite ASM models being widely accepted, some novel treatment processes, such as anaerobic ammonium oxidation processes 36 and membrane treatment, 37 are still lacking for standard modeling frameworks. 34 Also, digital twins or virtual replicas of water and wastewater treatment infrastructures have been developed. Some examples include simulation platforms such as EPANET for drinking water distribution network, collection systems (info works, SWMM) water-related domain (DHI) and water resources recovery facilities (Biowin, Aquasim, GPS-X, Sumo, Simba, WEST).…”
Section: Mechanistic Wastewater Models: a Piece Of Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization and troubleshooting efforts, and the estimation of resource requirements are other advantages of benchmark calculations using ASM models . Nevertheless, ASM models also have some drawbacks such as model complexity, accuracy, data requirements, high uncertainty due to many simplifications and assumptions, lack of adaptability, insufficient model validation, and computational requirements. …”
Section: Mechanistic Wastewater Models: a Piece Of Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) play critical roles in protecting the environment and public health, and digital solutions have demonstrated great promise in modernizing WWTP operation. Using a text mining technique, more than 9,800 studies were found to use or discuss data-driven relevant methods based on a database of 320,000 wastewater-related publications . However, studies found that the digitalization of wastewater sector has been slower than the drinking water industry, primarily because wastewater sensors have lower reliability due to the complexity of wastewater, and the long lag time of biological tests cannot provide real-time monitoring information. , Other factors that lead to the difference are mainly stemmed from different natures of responsibility in treatment and economic incentives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%