2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2018.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid model predictive control based dynamic pricing of managed lanes with multiple accesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lou et al developed a self-learning toll calculation algorithm that searches for the optimal toll based on the approaching demand, learned willingness to pay, and the estimated TTs ( 19 ). Tan and Gao suggested toll pricing methods based on model predictive control, which considers different origin-destination (OD) pairs in toll calculation ( 20 ). Zhu and Ukkusuri proposed a distance-based algorithm that finds the optimal toll via an R-Markov Average Reward Technique-based reinforcement learning algorithm ( 21 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lou et al developed a self-learning toll calculation algorithm that searches for the optimal toll based on the approaching demand, learned willingness to pay, and the estimated TTs ( 19 ). Tan and Gao suggested toll pricing methods based on model predictive control, which considers different origin-destination (OD) pairs in toll calculation ( 20 ). Zhu and Ukkusuri proposed a distance-based algorithm that finds the optimal toll via an R-Markov Average Reward Technique-based reinforcement learning algorithm ( 21 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al ( 2 ) solve for optimal tolls for each entrance and exit by assuming that, if a traveler enters the managed lane, they do not exit it until their destination. Zhu and Ukkusuri ( 3 ) and Tan and Gao ( 12 ) make similar assumptions in their pricing models and use a binary logit model to determine lane choice. Pandey and Boyles ( 4 ) use VOT distributions to model lane choice by comparing utilities over a set of routes called decision routes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binary logit route choice models used in the literature ( 2 , 3 , 12 ) assume that travelers do not exit the managed lane from when they enter until the end of the corridor. The diverge nodes located on the managed lanes are no longer considered as decision points.…”
Section: Routing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several dynamic pricing algorithms have been explored in the literature that optimize tolls under varying assumptions on driver behavior. These include methods using stochastic dynamic programming [32], hybrid model predictive control (MPC) [27,28], reinforcement learning (RL) [20,36], and approximate dynamic programming [19]. While these algorithms do well against existing heuristics, they make some or all of the following restricting assumptions, which we relax:…”
Section: Introduction 1background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restricted access for travelers: travelers do not exit the managed lane once they enter till their exit is reached [32,36] and that they only consider the first entry point as the decision point for the lane choice decision [27] 2. Fully observable system: toll operators have access to measurements of traffic density throughout the network for optimizing tolls [19,20,27,32,36] 3. Ignored traveler heterogeneity: a single vehicle class is considered with a single origin and destination [19,32,36] 4.…”
Section: Introduction 1background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%