2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid machine learning/physics-based approach for predicting oxide glass-forming ability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear regression, GPR, and RF were tried for each step, and the RF and GPR models had the lowest error for the two respective steps. Details of these techniques and other uses are described elsewhere 12–14 . The training of the RF was done twice with different features (inputs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Linear regression, GPR, and RF were tried for each step, and the RF and GPR models had the lowest error for the two respective steps. Details of these techniques and other uses are described elsewhere 12–14 . The training of the RF was done twice with different features (inputs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of these techniques and other uses are described elsewhere. [12][13][14] The training of the RF was done twice with different features (inputs). The two features used were the absolute temperature (T) and 1000/T, with the 1000/T RF outperforming the T models.…”
Section: Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A further in‐depth discussion of CNNs can be found in numerous sources 25–27,29 . As far as the authors are aware, this is the first application of CNNs to glass‐ceramics; however, we have previously presented other machine learning applications to GC 4,30,31 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%