Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2448196.2448200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid long-range collision avoidance for crowd simulation

Abstract: Abstract-Local collision avoidance algorithms in crowd simulation often ignore agents beyond a neighborhood of a certain size. This cutoff can result in sharp changes in trajectory when large groups of agents enter or exit these neighborhoods. In this work, we exploit the insight that exact collision avoidance is not necessary between agents at such large distances, and propose a novel algorithm for extending existing collision avoidance algorithms to perform approximate, long-range collision avoidance. Our fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work by Narain et al [2009] presents a mixed representation (discrete and continuous) for the crowd with a collision avoidance model adequate for high density crowds. In the same line, the work by Golas et al [2014b] develops a collision avoidance model capable of working in the full range of densities. Combined with a pressure field to include inter-personal stress and individual discomfort, the model can simulate crowd turbulence [Golas et al 2014a].…”
Section: Mechanics Based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work by Narain et al [2009] presents a mixed representation (discrete and continuous) for the crowd with a collision avoidance model adequate for high density crowds. In the same line, the work by Golas et al [2014b] develops a collision avoidance model capable of working in the full range of densities. Combined with a pressure field to include inter-personal stress and individual discomfort, the model can simulate crowd turbulence [Golas et al 2014a].…”
Section: Mechanics Based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the data shown in Table II we can extract two main conclusions: the prevalence of the microscopic models respect to the macroscopic ones and the concentration of works in two bibliographic areas: on the one hand research publications related [Reynolds 1987;1999;Ondrej et al 2010;Martinez-Gil et al 2014 et al 2008a;Pettré et al 2009;Karamouzas et al 2009;Guy et al 2009;van den Berg et al 2011;Olivier et al 2012;He et al 2016] Path finding and route choice Mechanics Social force [Freimuth and Lam 1992;Helbing et al 1997c;Helbing et al 1997a;Gilman et al 2005 [Chenney 2004;Treuille et al 2006;Narain et al 2009;Golas et al 2014b] and virtual Agency Agent-based [Kuffner 1999] environments Datadriven Data-driven [Lerner et al 2007;Lee et al 2007;Ju et al 2010;] CA CA [Kneidl et al 2013 Yilmaz et al 2009;Pluchino et al 2014] to Computer Graphics and, more specifically, Computer Animation (Group A); on the other hand, publications related to Transportation Research. This indicates that fundamental studies have made way to research in fields where the models are applied.…”
Section: Summary Of Modeling Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early, longdistance obstacle detection avoids the congestion so that each group rotates around the center instead of having a congestion there. We obtained interactive performance and reproduced the behavior modeled in [7] with a much simpler method than the original study's mixed approach, which used both continuum and discrete methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Behavioral comparison with local models. We tried to replicate the same test benchmark of Golas et al [7], where diametrically opposed groups try to move in opposite directions in space. Early detection of distant groups, combined with knowledge of agent direction, enable them to avoid the congestion in the center of the space.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation