2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid integration of Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan area (India) using GIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
222
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 518 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
11
222
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee 2005;Goetz et al 2011Goetz et al , 2015Youssef et al 2016;Castro Camilo et al 2017) and Machine-Learning approaches (e.g. Lee et al 2004;Ermini et al 2005;Marjanovic et al 2011;Pham et al 2017) are also used in this type of analyses. Such approaches are very sensitive to the type and quality of the factors chosen for the susceptibility analysis, and the lack of suitable expert opinion can produce unreliable results (Soeters and Van Westen 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee 2005;Goetz et al 2011Goetz et al , 2015Youssef et al 2016;Castro Camilo et al 2017) and Machine-Learning approaches (e.g. Lee et al 2004;Ermini et al 2005;Marjanovic et al 2011;Pham et al 2017) are also used in this type of analyses. Such approaches are very sensitive to the type and quality of the factors chosen for the susceptibility analysis, and the lack of suitable expert opinion can produce unreliable results (Soeters and Van Westen 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of the present study are comparable with Rodriguez et al (2006) and which showed that the Rotation Forest ensemble performs significantly better than other models such as AdaBoost and Random Forest; however, its performance is less than the MultiBoost ensemble, and quite similar to the Bagging ensemble. In comparison to other methods, the novel classifier ensemble model uses Na€ ıve Bayes classifier which has abilities to deal with uncertainty and Rotation Forest ensemble which is more effective in dealing with small sample sizes, high-dimensional and complex data structures (Pham et al 2016d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods usually use new soft computing techniques that perform better than conventional methods and techniques (Pham et al 2016d).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common data mining methods used in landslide modeling are artificial neural networks [11,15,16], support vector machines [17][18][19][20][21], decision trees [10,20,22], and neuro-fuzzy [23,24]. Literature review shows that new data mining algorithms are suitable for landslide modeling for large and complex areas with good results [3,[25][26][27][28][29][30], and, in general, data mining models outperform conventional methods [10,[31][32][33]. However, recent studies on landslide modeling show that the overall performance of prediction models could be enhanced with the use of ensemble frameworks [31,34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%