Hybrid framework of decision making in military: case study of railway planning

Wadjdi, Achmad Farid; Suhirwan, Suhirwan; Firdaus, Yeyep

doi:10.1088/1755-1315/195/1/012006

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When we compare the AHP-DEMATEL-FMEA framework with the results of our previous research [21][22][23], we think that agenda-setting requires a complex series of data collection and treatment with a variety of tested frameworks. We should conduct the test so that we can compile computational algorithms with accountable results.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework of Combined MCDM for Formulating Agenda-Setting in Overcoming Mining Conflicts

Wadjdi¹,

Hayuningtyas²

2020

Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Strategic and Global Studies, ICSGS 2019, 6-7 November 2019, Sari Pacific, Jakar

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework of Combined MCDM for Formulating Agenda-Setting in Overcoming Mining Conflicts

Wadjdi¹,

Hayuningtyas²

2020

Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Strategic and Global Studies, ICSGS 2019, 6-7 November 2019, Sari Pacific, Jakar

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This approach has been used to study the strategy of development of railway transport in West Africa [19]; to study different mode of transport to determine the transport strategy [20]; to analyses the Long-Distance Passenger Transportation on a Highway Network [21]; to investigate urban planning [22]; for energy automobile industry [23]. Other authors used an integration of more multi-criteria methods with SWOT analysis, [24][25][26]. In these cases, one method is used to determine the weights of criteria, and another method is applied to assess the alternatives.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Integrated Approach of Strategic Planning and Multi-Criteria Analysis to Evaluate Transport Strategies in Railway Network

Stoilova¹

2022

Railway Transport Planning and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter presents a methodology for selecting transport strategy for railway passenger transport development. The strategic planning, as Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental (PESTLE) analysis and Strengths - Weaknesses – Opportunities - Threats (SWOT) analysis integrated with Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) have been applied as a tool to make decision. The proposed methodology consists five stages. The first stage formulates the alternatives of the policies for railway manager. The criteria in each PESTLE group have been defined in the second step. The total number of 24 criteria has been studied. In third stage, the SIMUS method based on linear programming has been applied to rank the alternatives and assess the criteria in PESTLE groups. The fourth stage represents the ranking by application the different multi0criteria approaches as distance based, utility based and outranking methods to make decision. The combination the PESTLE analysis with SWOT analysis for strategic planning is done in the fifth stage. The integration of the PESTLE with technical, economic, technological and environmental (TETE) analysis in presented. The application of methodology has been demonstrated with an example for Bulgarian railway network. Three strategies of railway transport development have been evaluated and compared. It was found that the most important are the political (0.29), social (0.25) and technological (0.25) groups in PESTLE analysis.

show abstract

“…A hybrid approach based on Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy TOPSIS methods and SWOT analysis was applied in [29] to assess alternative railway lines. The criteria in the SWOT group were determined through Focus Group Discussion.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Policies of Railway Operators Using SWOT Criteria and the SIMUS Method: A Case for the Bulgarian Railway Network

Stoilova

Munier

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study is useful for railway operators as it enables them to verify their decisions against the results of the application of the techniques of strategic planning and multi-criteria analysis. It gives railway stakeholders concise, objective and unbiased information so that they can then make decisions and also allows them to determine the strengths and sensitivity, of the best solution found. This paper presents a methodology for the assessment of the policies of railway operators using Strengths–Weakness–Opportunities–Threats (SWOT) criteria and the Sequential Interactive Modelling for Urban Systems (SIMUS) method. The methodology of the research consists of two stages. In the first stage, the alternatives of the policies for the railway operator are formulated; the criteria in the SWOT group are defined; and the values of the criteria are determined for each of the alternatives. In the second stage, the SIMUS method is applied to rank the alternatives and assess the criteria in the SWOT groups. The criteria are interpreted as objectives and linear optimizations are performed. A comparison between the desired values for each objective of the SWOT criteria and the optimum values of the objective functions obtained by SIMUS was made. The methodology was applied to the Bulgarian railway network. Three policies for railway operation were studied. The total number of 17 railway policies criteria in the SWOT group were defined and assessed—three strengths criteria, seven weaknesses criteria, three opportunities criteria and four threats criteria. The results indicated that the best strategy is A3 (some reconstruction of the railway infrastructure and new rolling stock on some lines), with the highest score of 3.76, followed by A2 (new rolling stock on some lines), with a score of 2.71. The status-quo strategy (A1) has a very low score of 0.43, that the current situation or status-quo cannot be supported. The weights of both strengths and opportunities are both of the same importance with a weight of 0.180. It was found out that the clusters Weakness and Threats are dominant with weights of 0.4 and 0.24 respectively. The results show that the weights are all practically the same, about 0.06, and therefore, no discrimination by importance is possible. The methodology makes it possible to consider the alternatives simultaneously, and in this way, the results will reflect the effect of one criterion on all others, and permit us to quantify the differences between expected and real results.

show abstract

Hybrid framework of decision making in military: case study of railway planning

Cited by 3 publications

References 29 publications

A Framework of Combined MCDM for Formulating Agenda-Setting in Overcoming Mining Conflicts

A Framework of Combined MCDM for Formulating Agenda-Setting in Overcoming Mining Conflicts

An Integrated Approach of Strategic Planning and Multi-Criteria Analysis to Evaluate Transport Strategies in Railway Network

Analysis of Policies of Railway Operators Using SWOT Criteria and the SIMUS Method: A Case for the Bulgarian Railway Network

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About