2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.g003617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Differential Dynamic Programming in the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected from the previous discussion, Trajectory α is the most fuel-efficient, requiring just 35.34 kg of fuel, while Trajectory γ requires nearly double the fuel mass (i.e., 61.27 kg), and Trajectory β is the most fuel expensive (at 81.28 kg). It should be noted that the fuel-optimal trajectory discovered through the application of the proposed method (i.e., Trajectory α) agrees with results published by Aziz et al [22]. A slightly lower fuel requirement is found here, which is explained by the fact that the Hybrid Differential Dynamic Programming (HDDP) algorithm applied by Aziz et al enforced a constant direction of thrust over each integration step and can lag in x (km) x (km) x (km) switching thrust on or off [22], whereas indirect methods allow thrust to be applied in the optimal direction of the primer vector at every point along the trajectory and enforce throttling on or off at the optimal times.…”
Section: Minimum-fuel Tpbvp Solutionssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As expected from the previous discussion, Trajectory α is the most fuel-efficient, requiring just 35.34 kg of fuel, while Trajectory γ requires nearly double the fuel mass (i.e., 61.27 kg), and Trajectory β is the most fuel expensive (at 81.28 kg). It should be noted that the fuel-optimal trajectory discovered through the application of the proposed method (i.e., Trajectory α) agrees with results published by Aziz et al [22]. A slightly lower fuel requirement is found here, which is explained by the fact that the Hybrid Differential Dynamic Programming (HDDP) algorithm applied by Aziz et al enforced a constant direction of thrust over each integration step and can lag in x (km) x (km) x (km) switching thrust on or off [22], whereas indirect methods allow thrust to be applied in the optimal direction of the primer vector at every point along the trajectory and enforce throttling on or off at the optimal times.…”
Section: Minimum-fuel Tpbvp Solutionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Note that the mass unit (which is a unique value for a given scenario) is defined as the initial mass of the spacecraft m i . The chosen scenarios provide problems of moderate difficulty to benchmark our approach while allowing for validation and comparison to previous works [21,22,34,35,36,37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Trajectory optimization is a key enabler to improve the level of autonomy of an aerial vehicle [1][2][3]. Differential dynamic programming (DDP) has become a widespread method to solve nonlinear trajectory optimization problems due to its well-established problem formulation framework and fast convergence characteristics in recent years [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%