Hybrid Decision Support Methodology Based on Objective and Expert Data

Tsyganok, Vitaliy; Kadenko, Sergii; Andriichuk, Oleh

doi:10.1109/dessert50317.2020.9125022

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…3) Information operation counteraction (Tsyganok et al, 2020). The authors developed a hybrid approach, utilizing both expert open data for recognizing and counteracting information operations.…”

Section: Applications Of Combinatorial Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An update on combinatorial method for aggregation of expert judgments in AHP

Kadenko

Tsyganok

Szádoczki

et al. 2021

Prod.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article represents an extended version of the respective paper (Kadenko & Tsyganok, 2020), presented at the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP-2020). The key additions to the original conference paper include: elaborated description of several versions of combinatorial method, motivational examples, and results of the authors' most recent research on the subject.The best way to evaluate alternative decision options according to intangible criteria, that cannot be numerically described, is to compare them among themselves. This suggestion, made and empirically confirmed by Tom Saaty and his followers (Saaty, 1980(Saaty, , 1996, provided the basis for a whole family of AHP/ANP expert evaluation methods. These methods are widely used by decision-makers around the world. AHP/ANP application domains cover almost all spheres of human activity (as we can see from proceedings of multiple editions of

show abstract

Section: Applications Of Combinatorial Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An update on combinatorial method for aggregation of expert judgments in AHP

Kadenko

Tsyganok

Szádoczki

et al. 2021

Prod.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The works [7,8] considered fuzzy and other methods of processing expert assessments and established the rules for creating common solutions. Studies [9,10] contain hybrid decision-making methods based on expert and objective data. In [11], methods for determining the group ranking of incomplete expert conclusions were considered.…”

Section: Research Of Existing Solution To the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of decision approval rules in multichannel decision-making systems

Mulesa

Bilak

Kykyna

et al. 2021

TAPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research is devoted to the development of rules for the coordination of decisions in multichannel decision-making systems. Systems are considered that in an automated continuous mode process incoming signals from different channels and, on their basis, make the final decision. One of the most problematic stages in the operation of such systems is their own coordination of solutions received from different channels. There may be cases where different channels provide signals with opposite values. Then the choice of the decisive solution should depend on the reliability of the channels under consideration. The object of research is the processes that take place during the coordination of decisions in multichannel decision-making systems. The development and implementation of such systems will allow in an automated mode to generalize the solution obtained through different channels, to increase the reliability and efficiency of the systems as a whole. During the study, the following methods were used: – a systematic approach – when analyzing the structure and functioning of multichannel one-stage decision-making systems; – method of mathematical modeling – for formalizing the problem of coordinating decisions in multichannel decision-making systems; – method of analysis – when developing rules for agreeing decisions. The authors analyzed the structure of a one-stage multichannel decision-making system. The case is considered when the channels, based on the initial data entering the system, decide on the presence or absence of a certain fact. That is, the channels send signals from the set {True, False}. In the study, decision rules for the coordination of decisions were developed, taking into account not only the signals received from different channels, but also the reliability of the channels themselves. As is usual in decision theory, different rules can give different results for the same initial data. The choice of the decision rule depends on the decision maker, its personal psychological qualities and the scope of the system.

show abstract

“…Можливість організації зворотного зв'язку з експертами з метою підвищення якості (узгодженості, повноти, детальності) експертної інформації[38].4. Можливість врахування у СППР не лише експертної, а й іншої інформації, зокрема, отриманої на основі даних з доступних джерел[43]. Зазначена можливість напряму залежить від рівня розвитку засобів обробки природної мови (NLP), що використовуються для ППР.5.…”

unclassified