“…In this part, a series of state-of-the-art methods is compared to prove the superiority of the proposed method, and the experimental results of two datasets are reported in Tables 3 and 4. The experimental results for the larger dataset, RadioML 2018.01A, are mainly observed to determine the AMC accuracy by comparing it with HCGDNN [5], DSSFNN [13], Deep-LSTM [29], and GCN [31], while the smaller dataset, RadioML 2016.10A, is tested to comprehensively evaluate the overall AMC performance by comparing it with Augmented CNN [27], DL-PR: CNN [30], MS-Transformer [32], and FC-MLP [46]. According to the results, the pruned models, i.e., MobileRaT-A (0.67×) and MobileRaT-B (0.38×), improve their respective AMC accuracies from 60.2% and 62.6% to 61.8% and 63.2%, accompanied by more efficient reasoning.…”