“…The degradation rate of polymeric scaffolds strongly correlates with the material composition, the polymer molecular architecture (e.g., side groups, aromatic groups, double or triple bonds, and crosslinking), and the fabrication method (e.g., blending and copolymerization), which controls the degree of chain scission (Liu et al, 2012 ; Ferrari et al, 2017 ; Ferreira et al, 2019 ; Keirouz et al, 2020 ; Sadeghi-avalshahr et al, 2020 ) and modulates the biodegradability, hydrophilicity, and biocompatibility as well as cell adhesion, proliferation, growth, and antibacterial activity in TE applications (Gao et al, 2019 ). Polymer crosslinking reduces the degradation rate (Bi et al, 2011 ; Kishan et al, 2015 ; Chen et al, 2020 ), whereas the incorporation of a high fraction of nanoparticles (NPs) to play the role of bioactive sites in the scaffold may increase the degradation rate (Mehrasa et al, 2016 ; Radwan-Pragłowska et al, 2020 ), although some studies have shown an opposite effect (Mehrasa et al, 2016 ; Park et al, 2018 ). The degradation rate can also be tuned by chemical modification methods or by adding NPs that can neutralize acidic products (Zhang H. et al, 2014 ; Shuai et al, 2019 ).…”