Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1609.05078
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Beamforming for Massive MIMO - A Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, we investigate the lower bound on the per-cell achievable rate in (32) of different MMSE precoding schemes in downlink, where r = 8. While the 'full-dimensional MMSE' represents the conventional M -dimensional MMSE channel estimation and precoding scheme based on s s s k in (17) without spatial (de)spreading, the 'low-dimensional MMSE' is given by ( 19) and (23), where d indicates the number of Fourier coefficients used out of r ones under the Fourier correlation model for spatial (de)spreading. The 8-dimensional (d = 8) channel estimation and precoding are shown to cause only graceful performance degradation, compared to the 100-dimensional vector operation.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2, we investigate the lower bound on the per-cell achievable rate in (32) of different MMSE precoding schemes in downlink, where r = 8. While the 'full-dimensional MMSE' represents the conventional M -dimensional MMSE channel estimation and precoding scheme based on s s s k in (17) without spatial (de)spreading, the 'low-dimensional MMSE' is given by ( 19) and (23), where d indicates the number of Fourier coefficients used out of r ones under the Fourier correlation model for spatial (de)spreading. The 8-dimensional (d = 8) channel estimation and precoding are shown to cause only graceful performance degradation, compared to the 100-dimensional vector operation.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, spatial despreading/spreading is in fact long-term or wideband (i.e., frequency non-selective) processing, while low-dimensional combining/precoding is short-term or narrowband (frequency selective) processing. Therefore, they are amenable to the hybrid beamforming architecture (see [23] and references therein) that is beneficial to realize massive MIMO in practice by saving hardware cost and channel training/feedback overhead.…”
Section: C(snr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) Partially-connected RF Precoding Structure: In this case, each RF chain is connected to a sub-array of antennas via phase shifters and each antenna is only connected to a single RF chain [9], as illustrated in Fig. 3-(b).…”
Section: B Various Implementation Methods For Rf Precodermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal THP design depends on the RF precoding structure and the specific application scenario. There are two major RF precoding structures: the fully-connected structure where each antenna is connected to all the RF chains, and the partially-connected structure where each antenna is only connected to a single RF chain [9]. For each structure, there are two methods to implement the dynamic RF precoder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%