2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Approaches to Structural Characterization of Conformational Ensembles of Complex Macromolecular Systems Combining NMR Residual Dipolar Couplings and Solution X-ray Scattering

Abstract: Solving structures or structural ensembles of large macromolecular systems in solution poses a challenging problem. While NMR provides structural information at atomic resolution, increased spectral complexity, chemical shift overlap, and short transverse relaxation times (associated with slow tumbling) render application of the usual techniques that have been so successful for medium sized systems (<50 kDa) difficult. Solution X-ray scattering, on the other hand, is not limited by molecular weight but only pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 178 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More advanced approaches to restraint-based structure determination incorporate fitting to data derived from a combination of complementary techniques. For example, the combination of restraints obtained from NMR and SAXS experiments provides an established and powerful strategy for investigating structure and dynamics in large, multidomain proteins (139). Further, scoring functions based on a variety of proteomics data can be applied as an acceptance criterion to select computationally derived structures that satisfy experimentally determined spatial restraints; such an approach was employed to determine the molecular architecture of the yeast nuclear pore complex (6, 7).…”
Section: Computational Structural Refinement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More advanced approaches to restraint-based structure determination incorporate fitting to data derived from a combination of complementary techniques. For example, the combination of restraints obtained from NMR and SAXS experiments provides an established and powerful strategy for investigating structure and dynamics in large, multidomain proteins (139). Further, scoring functions based on a variety of proteomics data can be applied as an acceptance criterion to select computationally derived structures that satisfy experimentally determined spatial restraints; such an approach was employed to determine the molecular architecture of the yeast nuclear pore complex (6, 7).…”
Section: Computational Structural Refinement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, SAS experimental data serve as a source of spatial restraints reflecting the overall dimensions and shape of the macromolecule, whereas NMR experimental data provide information regarding proximity of different parts of the biopolymer chain with respect to one another. Combined NMR-SAS structure determinations typically yield significant improvements in both accuracy and precision of structural models versus those computed solely with NMR data, particularly for dynamic systems [53, 54]. …”
Section: Future Of Structural Biology and The Role Of The Wwpdbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining as detailed as possible a picture of the disordered ensemble would ideally combine information from all of these experiments, if available. This can be done most comprehensively via an explicit ensemble description of the disordered state, either by reweighting of an existing molecular simulation [2][3][4][12][13][14][15][16][17] , or by performing an ensemble structural refinement with a very large number of replicas of the system [18][19][20][21][22][23] . However, a simpler approach is frequently useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%