2008
DOI: 10.1049/el:20083167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid approach for sub-arrayed monopulse antenna synthesis

Abstract: A computationally effective hybrid approach to define the "optimal" compromise between sum and difference patterns in monopulse arrays is presented. Firstly, the partitioning into sub-arrays is performed by exploiting the knowledge of independently optimal sum and difference excitations. Then, the sub-array gains are computed by means of a gradient-based procedure, which takes advantage from the convexity of the problem at hand. Selected results are shown and compared with those from state-of-the-art methods i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I). Such an event further confirms the importance of exploiting the partial convexity of the problem at hand [10] [15]. As far as the Hybrid − ACO is concerned, the convergence pattern faithfully matches the reference one and outperforms the solution of the Hybrid − BEM [15] as well as that of the "bare" ACO of more than 3.5 dB and 2.4 dB, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I). Such an event further confirms the importance of exploiting the partial convexity of the problem at hand [10] [15]. As far as the Hybrid − ACO is concerned, the convergence pattern faithfully matches the reference one and outperforms the solution of the Hybrid − BEM [15] as well as that of the "bare" ACO of more than 3.5 dB and 2.4 dB, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Unlike [15] [16], the grouping of the array elements is determined by solving the excitation matching problem through the ACO-based global optimization [14]. At the second step, the computation of the sub-array weights is recast as the solution of a standard quadratic programming aimed at enforcing peak sidelobe level control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Towards this end, the sub-array weights are now computed solving a Convex Programming (CP ) problem as in [9] starting from the sub-array configuration obtained by means of the CP M . the results of the hybrid approach (CP M − CP , [18]) as well as those synthesized by the CP M and in [9]. With reference to the configuration in Tab.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a case, the optimal sum pattern is usually generated through an independent beam-forming network, whereas the sub-optimal difference one is obtained spatially aggregating the elements into sub-arrays and assigning a suitable weight to each of them. Towards this purpose, analytical procedures [12] [13], stochastic optimization algorithms [14][15] [16] [17], and hybrid methods [18] [19] have been successfully applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%