2023
DOI: 10.1049/elp2.12330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid analytical model for air‐gap magnetic field prediction of surface‐mounted permanent magnet motors with a quasi‐regular polygon rotor

Abstract: In this article, a hybrid analytical model for a quasi‐regular polygon rotor (QPR) is proposed. It mainly uses the subdomain method and conformal mapping to solve a non‐circular boundary in the QPR. Firstly, the subdomain method combined with an equivalent surface current method is used to calculate the air‐gap magnetic field considering a slotted stator with a circular rotor. Secondly, by segmenting the non‐circular boundary in the QPR, the complex relative air‐gap permeance of the QPR can be calculated using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method considers the slotting effect and a relative permeability of the iron as function of the local flux value. Chen et al [65] combine the usage of subdomain techniques and CM in order to overcome problems given by quasi-regular polygon rotors, causing non circular boundary in surface permanent magnets motors. The combination of these methods leads to accurate results compared with both Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and experimental data, thus taking advantage of the reduced computational time, as outlined in the above papers.…”
Section: ) Hybrid Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method considers the slotting effect and a relative permeability of the iron as function of the local flux value. Chen et al [65] combine the usage of subdomain techniques and CM in order to overcome problems given by quasi-regular polygon rotors, causing non circular boundary in surface permanent magnets motors. The combination of these methods leads to accurate results compared with both Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and experimental data, thus taking advantage of the reduced computational time, as outlined in the above papers.…”
Section: ) Hybrid Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%