Aiaa Aviation 2021 Forum 2021
DOI: 10.2514/6.2021-2325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid AI-Based Demand-Capacity Balancing for UAS Traffic Management and Urban Air Mobility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This integrated approach produces an optimal solution that minimizes operational costs while maintaining airspace thresholds for traffic density. To accomplish the DCB mission in dense urban airspace, a novel framework [129] is presented, namely a hybrid AI algorithm architecture based on Deep Q Learning (DQN) + GA. To ensure optimal performance of strategic decision-making components, the hybrid AI architecture utilizes current state data for various factors, including UAV operating states, airspace states, flow management states, and low-altitude airspace environmental changes. Although the above studies showed promising results by providing effective DCB solutions to the UTM system, these proposed approaches did not provide more details on how it enhances the efficiency of UTM airspace by balancing capacity and safety.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Model With Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This integrated approach produces an optimal solution that minimizes operational costs while maintaining airspace thresholds for traffic density. To accomplish the DCB mission in dense urban airspace, a novel framework [129] is presented, namely a hybrid AI algorithm architecture based on Deep Q Learning (DQN) + GA. To ensure optimal performance of strategic decision-making components, the hybrid AI architecture utilizes current state data for various factors, including UAV operating states, airspace states, flow management states, and low-altitude airspace environmental changes. Although the above studies showed promising results by providing effective DCB solutions to the UTM system, these proposed approaches did not provide more details on how it enhances the efficiency of UTM airspace by balancing capacity and safety.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Model With Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also included a maximum capacity efficiency figure of merit based on individual scheme data. Table 9 below shows the remarks and weights assigned to various factors for the three methodologies presented in [111,129], and this XAI DCM. It can be observed from the comparison table that the proposed XAI DCM surpasses the [111,129] methodologies based on more realistic airspace considerations and thus present an overall weight factor of 81% as compared to the above methodologies with 55% and 40%, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Model With Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%