2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-021-04872-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid additive-subtractive femtosecond 3D manufacturing of nanofilter-based microfluidic separator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface quality criteria are one of the key disadvantages of femtosecond laser ablation. The technology performs in higher fabrication time but lacks in preserving sub-micron surface roughness [ 31 ]. The results of this investigation open a new discussion of the possibility to ablate structures with surface roughness values below 500 nm by employing bi-burst mode processing techniques.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surface quality criteria are one of the key disadvantages of femtosecond laser ablation. The technology performs in higher fabrication time but lacks in preserving sub-micron surface roughness [ 31 ]. The results of this investigation open a new discussion of the possibility to ablate structures with surface roughness values below 500 nm by employing bi-burst mode processing techniques.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate this difference visually, an example microfluidic channel was produced. It was manufactured either using non-burst ablation, with parameters specified in our previous works [ 31 ], or by using a newly discovered high-quality bi-burst methodology. In addition, we chose the T geometry channel to demonstrate the possibility to acquire sharp corners during processing.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More information on setup and polymerization parameters can be found in our previous work [19]. Parameters and considerations used for channel cutting are described in a dedicated research study by our group [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by their close proximity to the supporting channel walls. As channel walls can have significant deviations because of the fast cutting method [13], this translates to the valve walls being either deformed outward during fabrication or becoming seemingly thinner due to being partially inside the glass wall. However, as these only support structures, their deviations do not play an important role in the functionality of the device and seemingly would be much closer to the desired dimensions in the final device where channel walls are not present.…”
Section: Glass Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation