The content of the Royal College's report is herein reviewed, together with an outline of the background to its publication; its various shortcomings are highlighted. Several techniques of distortion employed in the report are enumerated and discussed, and suggestions are made as to how to avoid the introduction of bias into consensus statements. In conclusion, the article exhorts a united effort on the parts of all concerned to work together in accordance with the ethical principle of seeking to overcome the causes of human suffering.As physicians, a prime aspect of our ethical approach to patients is an overriding concern for their best interests. Intrinsic in this is a vocational desire to alleviate suffering. When it comes to a review of the published literature, this same principle naturally applies. The authors of this critique find themselves in a difficult position: whilst inherently subscribing to the above statement, at the same time they have profound ethical concerns about the way in which the Royal College of Physicians of London have published their report. This has led to a dilemma: how to draw attention to the shortcomings of the report without promoting discord? It was amidst this dilemma that it was decided to submit the critique to the Royal College, and not to publish it, at that time, despite considerable pressure from various quarters to do so.The critique was thus submitted to the college, four months before final publication of the report in 1992, and not circulated to the media, in order to give the college an opportunity to make good the report's shortcomings.When the report was eventually published, however, it still contained many of its original shortcomings. Rather than immediately publish the critique, consideration was given to the possible underlying mechanisms and influences that could have given rise to such a report being published in the first place. As a result of this approach, an article was written by the authors of this critique which addressed the complex issues of logic and motivation that might come into play in any attempt to achieve an 331 J Nutr Environ Med Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Sydney on 01/05/15 For personal use only. J Nutr Environ Med Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Sydney on 01/05/15 For personal use only. J Nutr Environ Med Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Sydney on 01/05/15 For personal use only. J Nutr Environ Med Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Sydney on 01/05/15 For personal use only. J Nutr Environ Med Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Sydney on 01/05/15 For personal use only.