2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2018.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hunting the position: On the necessity of dissonance as attunement for dialogism in classroom discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proponents of Vygotsky maintain that ideas can be shared and evaluated among students working in small groups and this may result in the development of their critical thinking skills (Gyogi, 2020;Jodairi Pineh, 2017;Lynch & Pappas, 2017;Sharan & Shaulov, 1989;Webb & Cullian, 1983;Wells, Chang, & Maher, 1990). Classroom discussion is considered valuable in that it provides an opportunity for learners to contribute to instructional scaffolding (Boelé, 2018). Christensen, Garvin, and Sweet (1991) claimed that students bring a variety of educational, professional, and daily experiences to classroom interactions and that, consequently, discussion as reciprocal communication can promote interlocutors' knowledge.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of Vygotsky maintain that ideas can be shared and evaluated among students working in small groups and this may result in the development of their critical thinking skills (Gyogi, 2020;Jodairi Pineh, 2017;Lynch & Pappas, 2017;Sharan & Shaulov, 1989;Webb & Cullian, 1983;Wells, Chang, & Maher, 1990). Classroom discussion is considered valuable in that it provides an opportunity for learners to contribute to instructional scaffolding (Boelé, 2018). Christensen, Garvin, and Sweet (1991) claimed that students bring a variety of educational, professional, and daily experiences to classroom interactions and that, consequently, discussion as reciprocal communication can promote interlocutors' knowledge.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%