2016
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2016)033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hunting for dark matter coannihilation by mixing dijet resonances and missing transverse energy

Abstract: Simplified models of the dark matter (co)annihilation mechanism predict striking new collider signatures untested by current searches. These models, which were codified in the coannihilation codex, provide the basis for a dark matter (DM) discovery program at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) driven by the measured DM relic density. In this work, we study an exemplary model featuring s-channel DM coannihilation through a scalar diquark mediator as a representative case study of scenarios with strongly interactin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
(231 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this scenario the collider phenomenology is largely dominated by the multi-jet plus large missing transverse energy (MET) searches [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. The sensitivity to direct and indirect dark matter searches is very weak, as discussed in [46]. The relic density prediction is dominated by X annihilation, which opens up seemingly excluded parameter space in DM mass or allows for less fine-tuning in the DM − X mass splitting than for electroweak coannihilation models.…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)118mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this scenario the collider phenomenology is largely dominated by the multi-jet plus large missing transverse energy (MET) searches [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. The sensitivity to direct and indirect dark matter searches is very weak, as discussed in [46]. The relic density prediction is dominated by X annihilation, which opens up seemingly excluded parameter space in DM mass or allows for less fine-tuning in the DM − X mass splitting than for electroweak coannihilation models.…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)118mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collider signatures of simplified models of coannihilating dark matter have been classified in [24] for all possible choices of quantum numbers of X. In reference [46] we explored the phenomenology of dark matter models where X is colored and the coannihilation process occurs through an s-channel mediator. These scenarios lead to a wide variety of characteristic collider signatures, notably from mediator single and pair-production.…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)118 4 Collider Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For larger values of Δm, however, the decay of the heavier component is more rapid and can thus occur within the detection volume. Such scenarios have been considered in the context of colliders [53][54][55][56][57][58][59] as well as fixed-target experiments [60,61]. Key features of these scenarios are the detection of Standard-Model particles arising from the decay of the heavier dark particle, potentially with a displaced vertex.…”
Section: Collider Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, dark matter coupled to kinetically mixed hidden photons suffers from strong direct detection constraints (see, e.g., [41]). A consistent dark matter model must hence simultaneously address the relic density mechanism and non-observation in the current experimental probes, and thus minimal models either require nonthermal dark matter production in the early universe, coannihilation channels [42][43][44], or resonant dark matter annihilation in order to divorce the early universe dynamics from collider processes (see, e.g., [45]). Moreover, while the nuclear recoil energy spectrum at direct detection experiments requires the dark matter JHEP06(2017)077 mass as input, colliders instead probe mediator masses if they are on-shell, which shows the complementarity between both approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%