1992
DOI: 10.2307/1344516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hungary's Transition to the Market: The Case against a 'Big-Bang'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many enterprises have managed to survive in the transition process; however, there was a possibility of them facing liquidity issues in new economic relations. On the other hand, some enterprises have been unable to engage in market competition, but have still survived the transition due to substantial subsidies they received from the state in the past (Hare, et al, 1992).…”
Section: The Economic System During and After The Transition Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many enterprises have managed to survive in the transition process; however, there was a possibility of them facing liquidity issues in new economic relations. On the other hand, some enterprises have been unable to engage in market competition, but have still survived the transition due to substantial subsidies they received from the state in the past (Hare, et al, 1992).…”
Section: The Economic System During and After The Transition Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, proponents of a gradual approach claim that a severe output collapse can be avoided if reform policy measures are not too tight. 19 A step-by-step elimination of subsidies to state firms, or a gradual removal of trade barriers, for instance, leaves enterprises an extended time to adjust to the new economic environment. Consequently, gradualism is said to lead to less sharp output deterioration and moderate initial unemployment.…”
Section: Gradualism Vs Shock Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, different countries, depending on their precise initial conditions and the quality of their initial post-communist leadership, followed quite diverse paths of reform, with varying success. There was extensive debate both about the pace of reform and about the most appropriate reform sequencing (Portes 1991;Hare -R ev esz 1992;Dewatripont -Roland 1995;Gros -Steinherr 2004;Turley -Luke 2011). These papers argued for gradual reforms and against a 'Big Bang' approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%