Hundred top-cited articles focusing on acute kidney injury: a bibliometric analysis

Abstract

BackgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a major global health issue, associated with poor short-term and long-term outcomes. Research on AKI is increasing with numerous articles published. However, the quantity and quality of research production in the field of AKI is unclear.Methods and analysisTo analyse the characteristics of the most cited articles on AKI and to provide information about achievements and developments in AKI, we searched the Science Citation Index Expanded for citations of AKI articles. For the top 100 most frequently cited articles (T100), we evaluated the number of citations, publication time, province of origin, journal, impact factor, topic or subspecialty of the research, and publication type.ResultsThe T100 articles ranged from a maximum of 1971 citations to a minimum of 215 citations (median 302 citations). T100 articles were published from 1951 to 2011, with most articles published in the 2000s (n=77), especially the 5-year period from 2002 to 2006 (n=51). The publications appeared in 30 journals, predominantly in the general medical journals, led by New England Journal of Medicine (n=17), followed by expert medical journals, led by the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (n=16) and Kidney International (n=16). The majority (83.7%) of T100 articles were published by teams involving ≥3 authors. T100 articles originated from 15 countries, led by the USA (n=81) followed by Italy (n=9). Among the T100 articles, 69 were clinical research, 25 were basic science, 21 were reviews, 5 were meta-analyses and 3 were clinical guidelines. Most clinical articles (55%) included patients with any cause of AKI, followed by the specific causes of contrast-induced AKI (25%) and cardiac surgery-induced AKI (15%).ConclusionsThis study provides a historical perspective on the scientific progress on AKI, and highlights areas of research requiring further investigations and developments.

The top 2,000 cited articles in critical care medicine: a bibliometric analysis

“…The Critical Care Medicine journal published the largest number of highly cited articles. In another bibliometric analysis investigating the top 100 cited articles in acute kidney injury, Liu and colleagues found that the top 100 articles originated from 15 countries, led by the US (n=81) (8). This is consistent with our study that authors from the US published more than half of the most highly cited articles in general.…”

“…The bibliometric studies can help to (I) identify hotspots in a certain area; (II) network connections between subspecialties; (III) the leading investigators; and (IV) author's scientific output. Many bibliometric studies focused on a few vital issues in the field of CCM such as sepsis, severe brain injury and acute kidney injury (6)(7)(8). However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no bibliometric study that analyzes the entire CCM area.…”

Global Research Trends in Lithium Toxicity from 1913 to 2015: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…The number of citations for the 10 top‐cited articles in lithium toxicity varied from 211 to 79, which was less than those in other subspecialties in non‐toxicological fields and within the range of citations in other subspecialties in toxicological fields . Citations fluctuate in different subspecialties and depend on the research activity in certain field.…”

The top 100 cited articles on urological emergencies: A bibliometric analysis

“…[25] Even though there are many publications on urological emergencies in current literature, there are very few bibliometric studies. [26] In this study, we conducted the bibliometric analysis of top 100 cited articles on urological emergencies since 1975 among 360 articles we obtained by using [27] We determined that the most cited article (467-fold cited) was "International Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis and Pyelonephritis in Women: A 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases" by Gupta et al [28] Citation numbers and being published in journals with high impact factors are important indicators of the quality of an article. Classically, it is not expected for the articles published in recent years to be cited as much as the older ones.…”

“…In another study Thomas et al [15] suggested that the most cited papers or classic papers in urology varied depending on the time period studied. In a bibliometric analysis on acute kidney injury by Liu et al [26] it was found that most of the clinical articles (55%) among the top 100 cited articles investigated patients with any cause of acute kidney injury, followed by the specific causes of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (25%) and cardiac surgery-induced acute kidney injury (15%) of the top 100 cited articles.…”