2019
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humour is serious: Minority group members’ use of humour in their encounters with majority group members

Abstract: This article adds to the social psychological literature on how minority group members seek to manage their interactions with majority group members. Specifically, it focuses on minority group members’ use of humour in interactions where they anticipate or actually experience prejudice. The data on which our analysis is based originate from interviews conducted with Roma in Hungary (N = 30). Asked about their interactions with majority group members, interviewees reported using humour as a means to (a) manage … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…He is stupid, he has no mind, he only thinks of stealing’. Of course, these are exaggerated, hyperbolic, and contestable depictions of Bulgarians talking about the Roma minority (Dobai & Hopkins, 2020). They are constructions of prejudice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He is stupid, he has no mind, he only thinks of stealing’. Of course, these are exaggerated, hyperbolic, and contestable depictions of Bulgarians talking about the Roma minority (Dobai & Hopkins, 2020). They are constructions of prejudice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, they are particularly attuned to what they believe others think about their group because they know majority group members have the power to act on their beliefs and so make them count (Lammers, Gordijn, & Otten, 2008). On the other, although there may be opportunities to exercise some control over the interaction through adopting various identity performances (Dobai & Hopkins, 2019; Hopkins & Greenwood, 2013; Kamans, Gordijn, Oldenhuis, & Otten, 2009), success cannot be guaranteed. Certainly, those involved in the production of identity‐related cultural products and practices (e.g., music) are likely to find their options limited because their livelihoods are dependent on orienting to the tastes of others – especially majority group members.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that these decisions to play along with the other's prejudices did not necessarily entail the public humiliation of the other (e.g., Dobai & Hopkins, 2020). Rather, one gets the sense of an individual taking pleasure in observing the other being blinded by their own assumptions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, and as Renfrew (2004, p. 489) observes, passing presents particular research challenges: ‘since its raison d'etre is to go undetected, passing escapes observational methodologies’ with the corollary that interviews again allow insight into otherwise invisible phenomena. Moreover, when researching identity concealment, interview research has the distinct advantage of allowing participants to report their beliefs about how others saw them (i.e., their meta‐perceptions: Vorauer, 2006) and the interactional concerns that shaped their identity presentation (Dobai & Hopkins, 2020; Hopkins & Greenwood, 2013; Hopkins et al, 2007).…”
Section: Hungarian Roma: Stigma and Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%