Fungal Immunology 2005
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-25445-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humoral Factors in the Protection of the Oral Cavity against Candidiasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 91 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…used an abrasive method, involving trauma to the oral mucosa (11). The immunocompetent oral mucosa is sufficient to resist candidal invasion, and comprises multiple innate defenses including tissue‐resident T cells, phagocytes, and epithelial cells, and also humoral factors such as β‐defensins and histatins, all of which are candidacidal (8, 9) and NO‐independent. Therefore with passive inoculation, phagocyte‐derived and salivary NO may be redundant in mediating fungal clearance, whereas the abrasive mode [representative of candidiasis involving physical trauma, e.g.…”
Section: Inos−/− Mice Are Not Susceptible To Experimental Oral Candidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used an abrasive method, involving trauma to the oral mucosa (11). The immunocompetent oral mucosa is sufficient to resist candidal invasion, and comprises multiple innate defenses including tissue‐resident T cells, phagocytes, and epithelial cells, and also humoral factors such as β‐defensins and histatins, all of which are candidacidal (8, 9) and NO‐independent. Therefore with passive inoculation, phagocyte‐derived and salivary NO may be redundant in mediating fungal clearance, whereas the abrasive mode [representative of candidiasis involving physical trauma, e.g.…”
Section: Inos−/− Mice Are Not Susceptible To Experimental Oral Candidmentioning
confidence: 99%