2015
DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humor styles and personality: A meta‐analysis of the relation between humor styles and the Big Five personality traits

Abstract: This research summarizes the knowledge generated in social psychology and positive psychology about the relationship between humor styles, personality and wellbeing. Specifically, a meta-analysis was performed with the results of 15 studies on humor styles measured by the Humor Styles Questionnaire (Martin, Puhlik-Doris, Larsen, Gray & Weir, 2003) in correlation with the personality traits measured by the Big Five Personality model (measured with different scales). Following the steps presented by Rosenthal (1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
1
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
48
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevant criteria of the HSQ are humor and psychosocial well-being, as the humor style concepts were derived from the literature in these two areas, and as the humor styles are defined as everyday functions of humor that are relevant to psychosocial well-being (Martin et al, 2003). Besides relating the HSQ to humor-related scales (e.g., Martin et al, 2003; Kuiper et al, 2004; Ruch and Heintz, 2016) and humor behaviors (Heintz, 2017), the HSQ is usually compared to personality traits (for a meta-analysis with the Big Five personality traits, see Mendiburo-Seguel et al, 2015) and to subjective well-being (e.g., Edwards and Martin, 2010, 2014; Jovanovic, 2011; Ruch and Heintz, 2013; Maiolino and Kuiper, 2014). These relationships have usually been associated with the humor in the HSQ scales.…”
Section: Study 2: Criterion Validity Of the Humor In The Humor Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant criteria of the HSQ are humor and psychosocial well-being, as the humor style concepts were derived from the literature in these two areas, and as the humor styles are defined as everyday functions of humor that are relevant to psychosocial well-being (Martin et al, 2003). Besides relating the HSQ to humor-related scales (e.g., Martin et al, 2003; Kuiper et al, 2004; Ruch and Heintz, 2016) and humor behaviors (Heintz, 2017), the HSQ is usually compared to personality traits (for a meta-analysis with the Big Five personality traits, see Mendiburo-Seguel et al, 2015) and to subjective well-being (e.g., Edwards and Martin, 2010, 2014; Jovanovic, 2011; Ruch and Heintz, 2013; Maiolino and Kuiper, 2014). These relationships have usually been associated with the humor in the HSQ scales.…”
Section: Study 2: Criterion Validity Of the Humor In The Humor Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Najbardziej rozpowszechnionym ujęciem osobowości jest teoria "wielkiej piątki" [11], która wykorzystywana była w wielu badaniach, w tym dotyczących humoru [12]. Obok niej popularna jest również koncepcja Hansa Eysencka, która zakłada istnienie trzech głównych dyspozycji -ekstrawersji (E), neurotyzmu (N) i psychotyzmu (P), opisujących różnice indywidualne w zakresie funkcjonowania poznawczego, emocjonalnego i społecznego.…”
Section: Trójczynnikowa Teoria Osobowości Hansa Eysenckaunclassified
“…w utrwalonych cechach psychicznych. Metaanaliza badań nad humorem w kontekście osobowościowej koncepcji "wielkiej piątki" wykazała silny związek pomiędzy adaptacyjnym humorem afiliacyjnym a podwyższoną ekstrawersją i obniżonym neurotyzmem [12]. Ten pozytywny styl humoru był również istotnym predyktorem ogólnego poczucia szczęścia i zadowolenia z siebie [21].…”
Section: Humor I Orientacja Pozytywna Oraz Ich Związki Z Dyspozycjamiunclassified
“…under the threat of punishment, or having the payment of money contingent upon their performances), are less likely to perform puzzle solving activity than subjects who solved the same puzzles 18 There is also a situationist debate over the Big Five: five scores (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) that are given to us that tell us a great deal about the ways we behave through our lives (Nettle 2007). (See also, Judge et al 1999;Mendiburo-Seguel et al 2015). Miller argues the Big Five contradicts virtue theory because those personality traits implied by the data are relatively fixed, tied to our genetic makeup, and variations in traits are produced as a result of natural selection (Nettle 2006;Cravchik and Goldman 2000), hence, such traits are not suitable for our ethical evaluation as virtue theorist assume (Miller 2014).…”
Section: Self-determination Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%