2016
DOI: 10.1108/tpm-04-2015-0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humor and group atmosphere

Abstract: Purpose -Given the importance of humor in interpersonal communication in groups and the influence of the positive group atmosphere on group effectiveness, this paper aims to provide initial empirical evidence supporting the validity of a short measure for affiliative and aggressive humor. Design/methodology/approach -Starting from existing individual-level measures of humor, this paper develops a short measure of affiliative and aggressive humor in groups. The reliability and validity of this scale in a combin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, humor has been mostly conceptualized as an individual trait that employees hold (Martin, Puhlik-Doris, Larsen, Gray & Weir, 2003). However, in line with Curșeu and Fodor (2016) and Sosik (2012) we argue that, as humor is inherent to social interaction, it can also be depicted as a social construction, a group or an organization level property. As an emergent state, group humor emerges out of the individual behaviors (displays of humor) and interactions among the team members and different groups working in the organization will display different types of group humor.…”
Section: Humor In the Workplacesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…So far, humor has been mostly conceptualized as an individual trait that employees hold (Martin, Puhlik-Doris, Larsen, Gray & Weir, 2003). However, in line with Curșeu and Fodor (2016) and Sosik (2012) we argue that, as humor is inherent to social interaction, it can also be depicted as a social construction, a group or an organization level property. As an emergent state, group humor emerges out of the individual behaviors (displays of humor) and interactions among the team members and different groups working in the organization will display different types of group humor.…”
Section: Humor In the Workplacesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The latent factor correlations between positive humor and negative humor ingroup, and between positive humor and negative humor outgroup were weak and non-significant. Previous studies have reported non-significant correlations (Curseu and Fodor, 2016) and low-to-moderate correlations (Martin et al, 2003;Blanchard et al, 2014;Cann et al, 2014) between positive humor and negative/aggressive humor. Thus, our findings in relation to correlation between positive humor and negative humor mirror previous research, and the lack of association indicates that positive and negative humor can be seen as two distinct facets of humor (Martin et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Investigating the nomological validity of the HCSS contributes to establishing repercussions of certain degrees of different humor climate within sport teams. Previous studies on humor climate lack investigation of nomological validity (Cann et al, 2014;Curseu and Fodor, 2016), and consequently it is difficult to compare our results of nomological validity with previous humor climate studies. Despite this, we argue that the CFA results support the nomological validity of our theoretical relations, and we encourage other researchers to examine these further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Given the indirect nature and ambiguity inherent in humorous communication, there is no agreed upon definition of humor. For this study, we define group humor as intentional communication exchanges that group members perceive as funny and amusing (Curs , eu and Fodor, 2016;Martin and Ford, 2018). We can distinguish two types of humor based on their social function in group conversations: liberating humor that facilitates a shift in perspective and gaining new insights and controlling humor that aims at influencing the behaviors of others through commanding comments or criticism masked as jokes (Lang and Lee, 2010).…”
Section: Humor and Conflict In Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%