2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8950-9_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humility and Religion: Benefits, Difficulties, and a Model of Religious Tolerance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
31
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be that nonreligious people are more open to changing their ideas, though we would want more supporting evidence before claiming this as a reliable effect. But overall, divergence between small self and need for accommodation in response to spiritual experiences presents an interesting paradox: spirituality can promote humility in relation to targets of belief (i.e., God and the sacred), but not humility about one's beliefs (see also Rowatt et al, 2007;Woodruff et al, 2014). Perhaps this apparent contradiction might be best understood through another: spiritual experiences are marked by a profound sense of smallness compared to an all-powerful and all-knowing God, but also connection to that greatness (Bai et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be that nonreligious people are more open to changing their ideas, though we would want more supporting evidence before claiming this as a reliable effect. But overall, divergence between small self and need for accommodation in response to spiritual experiences presents an interesting paradox: spirituality can promote humility in relation to targets of belief (i.e., God and the sacred), but not humility about one's beliefs (see also Rowatt et al, 2007;Woodruff et al, 2014). Perhaps this apparent contradiction might be best understood through another: spiritual experiences are marked by a profound sense of smallness compared to an all-powerful and all-knowing God, but also connection to that greatness (Bai et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a social scientific lens, it may be posited that religion also may (a) create moral certainty in believers that leads to conflict with nonbelievers (Woodruff, Van Tongeren, McElroy, Davis, & Hook, 2014); (b) divide people between believers and nonbelievers, saved and damned, "us" and "them" (Lichterman, 2008;Makowsky, 2011); (c) lead people to experience guilt, repression, and hypocrisy (Inozu, Karanci, & Clark, 2012); (d) promote passive fatalism (Franklin, Schlundt, & Wallston, 2008); (e) create gender inequities in marriage, family, and society (Schnabel, 2016;Sigalow & Fox, 2014); (f) encourage irrational and/or "magical" thinking (Routledge, Abeyta, & Roylance, 2016); (g) enable sexual, emotional, physical, and/or financial victimization and abuse of children, elderly, and other vulnerable persons (Simonic, Mandelj, & Novsak, 2013;Stotland, 2000); and (h) be subject to being employed as a destructive force or weapon (i.e., the Inquisition, pogroms, the Crusades, jihad, the Holocaust, terrorism).…”
Section: Religion May Harmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of the present study have several applications for religious communities and individuals. For instance, people often place a tremendous amount of importance and value in their religious beliefs and values, which may make staying humble toward someone with different religious views, beliefs, and values quite difficult (Woodruff, Van Tongeren, McElroy, Davis, & Hook, 2014). One reason for this difficulty may be that religious individuals often infuse religion and spirituality (R/S) into their global meaning system, which acts as a means of orienting oneself to the world (Park, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%